
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Paul Danaher"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, I suppose "simplistic" is meant to be payback for
>> "ignorant". I'm happy to swallow it as such. However, I'm
>> afraid I find what you say---French and American meddling
>> in south Vietnamese politics---as utterly simplistic. The
>> US created South Vietnam out of the French defeat at Dienbienphu.
>> So, duh, you *betcha* the US "meddled".
>
>The meddling was much further-reaching than this, whatever view you take of
>Diem's assassination.
>Quoting from http://hnn.us/articles/1717.html
>Beschloss records a conversation Johnson had with Donald Cook on November
>30, 1963, in which LBJ complained that we needed a new ambassador to replace
>Henry Cabot Lodge who won't want to "make Vietnam into America overnight."
>This sounds unnervingly familiar just at the moment.
>
Heh, "those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it" or something like
that <wg>. Even *Alexander the Great* got bogged down in the area now known as
Afghanistan <wg>.
But I'm studying for my Asian History Final <g>: (beginning of Medieval period
only, only up to Mughal period in India):
So, N. Vietnam S. Vietnam
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
- Conquered by Chinese in Wu period (100 BC) for 1,000 years
(but they never really controlled the south, which by
default
was "conquered" by India, why French called it
"IndoChina")
- history of resistence:
- series of revolts, most famous led by teh Trung sisters in
39 AD
- regained its independence after the fall of the Tang
dynasty
- had to repel the Mongols, the Ming, and the
Manchus
[2,000 years of chronic war,
prob. "contributing to Vietnamese
aggressiveness"*]
- points of divisions:
- north vs. south
China in north: Confucian Classics exam system
- gradually moving south
111 BC - 939 AD: Occupied by China,
thrown out by Le
900s - 1427 - Occupied by Dai Veit,
Chinese thrown out
*again* (founding of Le Dynasty)
1600s-1700s - Trinh
India in south:
- 0 - 100s AD: Funan (Indian) [earlier?]
- 100s - 550: - Funan & Champa
- 550 - 1471: - Champa (Hindu)
- ?
- 1500s - 1802: - Nguyen (with Tayson
unification in 1789)
[1600s: Chongs the "mountain people" (S.
Viet) defeat N.
Vietnam, but are squeezed out by the
Khmers from the South]
[Khmers prob.
originally migrated from S.
China around 100 BC, into Cambodia,
and established in Anghor by 7th century]
- uplands (mountains) vs. lowlands (coastal)
- "natives" vs. lowland settlers
- court vs. village
"the laws of the emperor bow to the customs
of the village"
- courts: history of collaborating with foreigners
(the elite)
-Confucian influence, such as filial
piety, duty, self-sacrifice
- male-oriented
- villages: see the court as negative,
- Buddhist, animistic (ghosts);
(some Taoism)
- female-oriented
- surrounded by hedgeways
("thickets")
Murphy, Rhoads. A History of Asia.4th Ed. Addison-Wesley, 2003. ISBN:
0-321-10496-X
Nguyen Du. The Tale of Kieu. Yale University, 1983. ISBN: 0-300-04051-2
- The main point seems to be the effortless blending of
Confucian, Buddhist, Taoist, and animistic beliefs in a single person, a
characteristic of Vietnam, which has always fiercely maintained their
*separate* cultural identity.
'
Stainless Steel Streetrat
-----------------------------------
"Living is the best revenge" - Conan the Barbarian
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |