Re: Government churches should be constitutionally rabid

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> PART I
> 
> [I said ] 
> >:|> This one is far better:
>  
>  
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=387669cf.12171966%40news.exis.net&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
> >:|> 
> >:|>  My Reply will be found in the newly posted article
> >:|> Christian Orthodoxy And The Founders
> >:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/orthodox.htm
> >:|
> 
> [ ambrose searle aka richard gardiner ] said
> >:|A "reply" that has been thoroughly answered at
> >:|
> >:|http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fe9a0c54.0311172019.274b6fb5%40posting.google.com
> 
> [ my reply]
> Now in your wildest dreams.
> 
> Your standard ploy here is to try and attack the source, be it a web site
> or the one posting or in some cases even a scholar.

My my my. Is little Allison pouting because someone turns his own
stock and trade against him.

Who is the loudest attacker of David Barton on the web? Hint look in
the mirror. Who has laid into James Hutson (at the LOC), D. James
Kennedy, Gary Amos, Harold Berman, Eidsmoe, Robertson, Dreisbach,
Smylie, etc., ad nauseum.

And you dare scold me for "attacking the one posting" when almost all
you've done for the last three months is obsessively go after the
identity of "Ambrose Searle," post after post after post with nothing
but "Ambrose Searle is Richard Gardiner." ROTFLMAO!

> That is pretty standard with you,

No one has the imfamous reputation for ad hominems that you have.
STANDARD FARE.

> you seem to want the world to believe
> that only you know the "truth," and anyone who disagrees with your position
> has got to have it wrong no matter who they are or how qualified they are. 

People are free to check my observations about your scholars:
Dershowitz, Semonche, etc. and see if they have the ACLU associations
I claim.

If having a Ph.D. and a bunch of similar credentials is all it takes
to qualify one as an expert, then bow at the feet of D.James Kennedy
my friend: A.B., M.Div., M.Th., D.D., D.Sac.Lit., Ph.D., Litt.D.,
D.Sac.Theol., D.Humane Let.

I will hand it to Dershowitz: his is a fine trial lawyer. He played a
great role in getting O.J. off the hook; just like he sells a bill of
goods in the church/state arena.

> You might sell that to members of the choir, but  you will not fool most
> people who may even bother to read any of the exchanges between us.

Actually I post in such a way that someone can follow my train of
thought without having to click on 40 links one after another after
another...

When most folks get to your huge cut-and-paste reposts that don't even
address the matter at hand, you are correct when you say they don't
bother to read them.

Like all the tangential cut-and-paste crap I just snipped from the
bottom of this post that is more of your fallacy ad magnum tactic
(viz., "if I cut and paste huge reams of digital material it will have
the appearance of bowling my opponent over with a mountain of
evidence.")

It ain't gonna fly jimbo.

So I redirect the inquisitive reader to this accurate assessment of
your "Christian Orthodoxy and the Founders" website:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fe9a0c54.0311172019.274b6fb5%40posting.google.com