Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:37:54 -0600, M. Clark wrote
(in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):

> Cary Kittrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Clark) writes: < <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> <
>> <[snip]
>> <> >:|such through an establishment of religion or education."
>> <> 
>> <> Irrelevant, neither are going to fly.
>> <> 
>> <> Scholars across the bd claim that the BORs cannot be amended, which is
>> <> exactly what you want to do.
>> <> 
>> <> There is no historical or legal precedent to separate state and 
>> education,
>> <> just the opposite in fact. Nor is there any legal or historical 
>> precedent
>> <> to add education to the wording of the 1st amendment.
>> <> 
>> <> Even though you may think otherwise, most Americans are satisfied with 
>> the
>> <> public educational system in this country. That doesn't mean they 
>> wouldn't
>> <> like to see improvements, etc, but it does mean they are not calling for
>> <> the abandonment of such a system as you are.
>> <
>> 
>> 
>> Well, there's a fascinating claim.  Tell me, how are atheists "keeping 
>> people
>> ignorant of their constitutional rights"?
> 
> Atheists are cheerleading the unconstitutional decisions of a confused
> Supreme Court with respect to church/state separation issues.


Why don't you set the Supreme Court straight?

I'm sure that they would appreciate it.



Gray Shockley
--------------------------
"Swinehood hath no remedy." - Sidney Lanier



> 
> M. Clark
>> 
>> -- cary