Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned

"Michael A. Clem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>>>Furthermore, why are we bound to what they wanted? 
>>
>>Why are we bound to what you want?
>
>You're not.  I'm not saying that people should be forced to accept what 
>I want, but by the same token, I don't see why I should be forced to 
>accept what others want.  Given the nature of funding for the public 
>school system, my choices are being forcibly limited.

The nature of public school funding does not limit your choices any
more than the nature of military funding or social security funding or
any other kind of funding.

>>You are correct.  We like to see evidence, not argument.
>>
>The newsgroups are hardly the best place to look for evidence and avoid 
>arguments...

Arguments without supporting evidence, however, attract derision.

lojbab
-- 
lojbab                                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org