Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[snip]
> >:|such through an establishment of religion or education."
> 
> Irrelevant, neither are going to fly.
> 
> Scholars across the bd claim that the BORs cannot be amended, which is
> exactly what you want to do.
> 
> There is no historical or legal precedent to separate state and education,
> just the opposite in fact. Nor is there any legal or historical precedent
> to add education to the wording of the 1st amendment.
> 
> Even though you may think otherwise, most Americans are satisfied with the
> public educational system in this country. That doesn't mean they wouldn't
> like to see improvements, etc, but it does mean they are not calling for
> the abandonment of such a system as you are.

The problem is that atheists are keeping people ignorant of their
constitutional rights so people aren't able to make informed decisions
about their school systems, for example.

M. Clark
> 
>       *****************************************
> >:|
> >:|>The amendment process was made difficult and made difficult for a reason.
> >:|>Seventeen Amendments since 1791 isn't a rush towards amendments for
> >:|>irrelevant reasons.
> >:|>  
> >:|>
> >:|Of course it was made difficult for a reason.  But that's also beside
> >:|the point--or can't you tell the difference between difficult and 
> >:|impossible?
> 
> 
> Actually, it is the point.
> It was made difficult so hair brain ideas such as some being offered in
[snip]