
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 08:22:55 GMT, Bob Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >That's why you need to rely on more than one source. The more data > >points available, the better the chance of an accurate portrayal. > > > That doesn't make too much sense - it would appear that the more > points of view available would only indi8cate that there were > possibilities for more input from the shills and you still could not > make an accurate judgement based on them. Why do you think that car magazines do not give bad reviews on many cars? They lose advertisement dollars from that company. Why does a car magazine give Ford's Focus such glowing reviews, when on the 2000 models there were 4 recalls on it alone ( the hatchback versions ). Not to mention many performance issues. But still, they gave it the "car of the year" monicker. Review sites are all scams. Advertisers dont want to support a site that bashes their products. Make a bad opinion, lose a $200,000 advertiser.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |