
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Dave C. wrote: > Three words . . . Honeywell, HEPA, and CADR. If you don't know that third > one, do some more research before you buy. It wouldn't surprise me if CADR > is the reason the sharper image ones are not rated that high. Consumer Reports tested some air cleaners in the October 2003 issue: CR tested the Sharper Image Ionic Breeze and the similar Honeywell Environizer against two high-scoring air cleaners, the Friedrich electrostatic precipitator and the Whirlpool HEPA filter. In its extended testing, CR gauged how well each air cleaner could handle the periodic introduction of small amounts of pollutant into a sealed test chamber over a 6-hour period. One set of tests used smoke, another fine dust. A second set of tests gauged how well each cleaner worked for the next 17 hours, after the last injection of pollutant. For both sets of tests, CR's experts ran the Ionic Breeze and the Environizer on high to maximize performance; the others were on low, their quietest setting. The Ionic Breeze and the Environizer didn't come close to the performance of the others. CR's experts found them quiet but ineffective. For that reason, Consumer Reports says the Ionic Breeze, Honeywell Environizer and the Hoover Silent Air 4000 are not worth buying. Consumer Reports says two good choices for room air cleaners are the Friedrich model number C-90A, at $500, and the Whirlpool that sells for about $270. Here's a link to some good info from the American Lung Association, including recommendations concerning ozone. They recommend controlling the source if at all possible: http://www.lungusa.org/pub/cleaners/air_clean_chap5.html And a FAQ from the California Air Resources Board: http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/indoor/acdsumm.htm
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |