
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"volts500" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "I-zheet M'drurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On 21 Nov 2003, Steve wrote: > > > > > Yes, it can and is done, however, there is a going to be a two pole > > > breaker that is set up for both hot leads of the old 240 circuit. The > > > handles will be ganged together and may not trip properly.. If and > > > when one circuit trips it will also trip the other circuit out.. > > > > NO. That's the way it must be, for safety and code. You can't > > have "the breaker trip" and still have one live wire in the > > circuit, BOTH sides must trip, that's exactly why you do use a > > double pole breaker. > > > > > You could change out the circuit breaker to two single poles and that > > > would correct that problem. > > > > You should seriously consider stopping to give out dangerous > > advice like that, you could get somebody hurt or killed under > > the wrong circumstances. > > If anyone in this NG needs to stop giving electrical advice, Tomi Boi, it's > _YOU_. A multiwire branch circuit needs to have simultaneous disconnection > of all ungrounded conductors _only_ if the it is supplying a device or > equipment on the _same_ yolk, such as a split wired duplex receptacle. Did > _not_ the OP say that he was going to install two duplex receptacle devices? > In that case a double pole breaker is not required, or, like Steve pointed > out, may not be desired. > this is Turtle. Don't worry about Tom shitforbrains for he was just having a burst of knowledge after having a prozac moment. he will be back to reality in about a hour or so. He should stop taking OxyContin and prozac at the same time. TURTLE
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |