
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"I-zheet M'drurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 21 Nov 2003, Steve wrote: > > > Yes, it can and is done, however, there is a going to be a two pole > > breaker that is set up for both hot leads of the old 240 circuit. The > > handles will be ganged together and may not trip properly.. If and > > when one circuit trips it will also trip the other circuit out.. > > NO. That's the way it must be, for safety and code. You can't > have "the breaker trip" and still have one live wire in the > circuit, BOTH sides must trip, that's exactly why you do use a > double pole breaker. > > > You could change out the circuit breaker to two single poles and that > > would correct that problem. > > You should seriously consider stopping to give out dangerous > advice like that, you could get somebody hurt or killed under > the wrong circumstances. If anyone in this NG needs to stop giving electrical advice, Tomi Boi, it's _YOU_. A multiwire branch circuit needs to have simultaneous disconnection of all ungrounded conductors _only_ if the it is supplying a device or equipment on the _same_ yolk, such as a split wired duplex receptacle. Did _not_ the OP say that he was going to install two duplex receptacle devices? In that case a double pole breaker is not required, or, like Steve pointed out, may not be desired.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |