
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "John D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If a housing development has common area aminities that must have > maintenance > and wants to set some architectural standards etc. Is there any other way to > organize it besides the typical covenents and a HOA, that will not subject > the the individual homeowner to the possibility of abuse? Simple-minded answer might be, a very tightly written and restrictive set of CC&Rs, strictly limiting what the HOA is authorized to do and what it's *not* authorized to do, along with stringent requirements (like approval by 85% of full membership) for making any changes in the CC&Rs. I think you may be asking for the near-impossible, however. Maintaining common areas: hopefully not likely to cause serious problems or differences of opinion downstream. "Architectural standards" however: can be an open invitation for conflict. Different people just have widely differing views on what these should mean; it's very hard to define these standards in a clear and definite fashion; and when someone violates the stated standards, then you have to have an official and quasi judicial procedure for handling the situation -- and then the can of worms is really open.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |