Re: HOA giving grief about fence

I am unaware of any instance of name calling perhaps I called you a
child?....which may be a matter of fact.
I have noticed that everyone is always pointing to CC&Rs as if it would be the
bible.
It is true that no one reads CC&Rs and R&R because it is usually copy of a copy
of a copy, illegible and written in cumbersome language as is the bible.
Neither is factual or makes any sense.
Neither is enforceable unless you declare a war.
Both are written for the purpose of an oppression.
-Sub





"steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub,
>
> I did not offer advice regarding taking the matter to court other than
> my opinion that the cost of doing so was more than the cost of
> re-staining / painting the fence if that is what the HOA ultimately
> insisted on after the home owner tried to work out a more favorable
> outcome. I have never been in favor of rushing to litigation --
> particularly in instances where the cost far outweighs other options.
>
> I have also never resorted to calling you names in this or any other
> forum, so what gives?
>
> You may or may not have a valid point regarding HOA CC&R or R&R
> enforcement if a matter goes to court, but unless you make your point
> using factual examples it is very hard to decide if you are correct or not.
>
> Please give me some factual examples regarding these issues  -- I would
> like to understand the basis for your position, and also please kindly
> refrain from name calling and other ad hominum tactics.
>
> Regards,
>
> steve
>
>
>
> Subcomandante wrote:
> > "steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>Thank you Frank!
> >>
> >>steve
> >>
> >>
> >
> > For what?
> > Your ignorance relating to CC&Rs enforcement in the court?
> > -Sub
> >
>