
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:32:59 +0000, Alan Beagley > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >But even if there is no HOA but there are restrictive covenants, one or > >more individuals with deep pockets to pay a lawyer could still make > >one's life miserable. Where there is a HOA, it is *your* money they use > >to make your life miserable. > > > > A municipality's zoning can be more oppressive than the worst HOA's > covenants! > That may be true. Nevertheless, if you have a castle you have a shelter from harm. You are safe in your castle. In the HOA you are always exposed to the elements. As long as we will continue to support socialists then they will always harm us! Whether in our HOA or in our municipalities. In California we ate experimenting with the "Terminator 3", lets see if that is a solution. -Sub
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |