
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"SoCalMike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > "kavking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > George states: (of profit sharing) > > > "...current employees get a very, very small fraction of that amount." > > > > > > Wal-Mart banks on that huge turnover of employees to keep their profit > > > sharing in their coffers. > > > > > > > Nobody banks on turnover. Turnover is extremely expensive. It's > > cheaper to pay profit sharing than it is to recruit, hire, orient, and > > train people over and over again. > > which is why half their employees leave in a given year? Do you know this for a fact? It seems that I see the same faces year after year at my Wal-Mart. > > > That's why you have profit sharing. It's an incentive to lower > > turnover. > > yeah- that $50 check does a whole lot. of nothing! That profit sharing check isn't a fifty dollar check, it's a check paid out when a person leaves employment. The policy is fairly standard with companies that offer profit sharing. It's considered a 'golden handcuff', designed to keep a person employed with the same company for a long period of time. You would be vested in a program, the longer you stay with the company, the larger your profit sharing check. K
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |