Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Misc Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Humidifier to reduce need for Heating



dogsnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
>snip

> I guess I'm supposed to be upset, but my skin has become so
>> calloused to such little pricks that I pay them scant attention.  
>It's inevitable on UNSENT.
>What helps me is: I just don't care!
>Wheeee!
>Oh, do I have_ to be serious? Very well.
>I try very hard to give the poster the benefit of the doubt
>and that they really, truly didn't mean to come across
>as insulting me. But in this case, when it's so obvious,
>resorting to silliness and childishness behavior is way frugal
>fun!
>Lalalalala!

Yep. BTDT.  Sometimes I revisit this behavior just to keep my clown handled
dirk from getting too rusty.  However, too much silliness is like a steady diet
of sweets; it tends to fatten, dull the senses, and become tasteless after a
while.  Better results can sometimes be had if one sticks to just desserts and
not just desserts.
 
>> 
>> As for his thinking I am hopelessly outgunned in generating pointless
>> mean-spiritedness personal attacks, I find the sentiment highly
>> complimentary. 
>As you should!
>You should leave the personal attacks to ME, as I *am* 
>studying for my entry level evil exams, after all.

May you get failing grades!  :-) I sometimes wish Agent had an automatic
scarlet "A.H." that attached to posts from people who habitually use (boring)
pointless personal attacks.  A proper attack should have a point, so that it
can be twisted when the opponent is stuck on it and refuses to concede it's
presence.  In contrast, I see more and more usenet attackers falling upon their
own swords, not out of discouragement or remorse, but because their swords are
too broad and too dull, and they are so clumsy in their attacks that they trip
and fall, publicly skewering themselves.

>> 
>> Pig-snorker, huh?  :-)
>
>I was going to use the pure form which is "pig-farker", 
>but very few people would know that it really means, 
>which is "pig-farmer".
>Not only isn't it nearly as insulting as a snorker, it's
>probably not true, either.

Never had the nose for farming pigs, but there have been stranger things that
Vermonters have farmed.  True story - Back in the 1800s, when patent medicines
were the rage, one enterprising couple in my hometown raised skunks for a
component in their miracle cure.  They were considered odd, and were social
outcasts except on days when neighbors could stand upwind, but they were still
respected members of the community.  Seems like some people on usenet today
have lost that couple's concept of creating something healing or helpful to
others, and only want to raise the stink.  >-p





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.