
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"SoCalMike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > "kavking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > George states: (of profit sharing) > > > "...current employees get a very, very small fraction of that amount." > > > > > > Wal-Mart banks on that huge turnover of employees to keep their profit > > > sharing in their coffers. > > > > > > > Nobody banks on turnover. Turnover is extremely expensive. It's > > cheaper to pay profit sharing than it is to recruit, hire, orient, and > > train people over and over again. > > which is why half their employees leave in a given year? I don't think you're right here. I shop at Wal-Mart and see the same faces year after year. > > > That's why you have profit sharing. It's an incentive to lower > > turnover. > > yeah- that $50 check does a whole lot. of nothing! And have you received a check? Is this how you know that it's a $50.00 check? It would seem that when you receive your profit sharing check it would be a one time thing, when you terminate your employment. Profit sharing is an incentive, a golden handcuff, that keeps people around a long time. It would certainly be a lot more than fifty dollars. k
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |