
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Dana Compton wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >>my mortgage payment nearly in half (A.R.M. 1.25% start rate/3.87% >>APR) >.ARM=Ajdustable rate mortgage. > >There is an adjustable rate mortgage. It starts off low and the interest rate >goes up for a number of years. 4 or 5 I think. It is what people get when they >want to overbuy and can't qualify for the higher payment. The only time to use >this one is on a property you intend to fix up and sell quickly. less interest >paid out of pocket. > >There is also a mortgage that changes with the current interest rates. Usually >gets a yearly review and has a cap, but the cap may be high. > >Both are a bad deal. You want a fixed rate mortgage. They are not _necessarily_ a bad deal. Two scenarios come to mind. You're young and buying a house for the first time. You have a decent job, but because you're new and inexperienced, your annual earnings aren't what others who've been there five or ten years are making. You can reasonably expect that in a few years you'll be making more, perhaps considerably more. You could buy something small/cheap now with a fixed rate, and trade up a few times as your earnings increase, or you could buy something bigger/more expensive now with an adjustable mortgage that starts out with a payment you can afford now and gets larger later on, saving you the trouble and expense of selling the old place and buying a new one, and obviating the need to move. The second scenario is you buy a house with an adjustable rate mortgage, and rates fall. The size of your payment declines over time, automatically, without the trouble and possible expense of periodic refinancings. The second scenario would have worked out well for me when I bought my second house, the one I'm in now. I got a fixed rate mortgage at the then astonishingly low rate of 9.5% when I bought. Rates have fallen more or less continuously since then, and I've refinanced, but if I'd had an adjustable mortgage, I would have ended up paying less interest over the life of the loan, even if rates shot up to the top of the cap tomorrow and I had to pay around 15% for the remaining 9 years or so I have to go. Of course, the second scenario would have worked against me with my first house, which I bought with a fixed rate mortgage of 10.5%. Over the next few years, rates did nothing but go up, peaking at somewhere around 20%. Given current conditions, with rates at near historic lows, my guess is that payments on an adjustable mortgage will go up rather than down, but I could be wrong. I'd suggest, however, that someone who doesn't know what "APR" means in this context needs to educate himself before even considering such a transaction. To answer the original question, it sounds like the loan starts out with an initial interest rate of 3.87% (and the payments are sized accordingly). The interest rate is tied to some index, and can rise (or fall) by 1.25% at the end of each adjustment period (usually a year) and the payment will rise fall with the rate change. Unstated is whether or not there's any cap, either on the low or high end, what the index is, what the margin is. Closing costs fall into two categories. One is points, a certain percentage of the principal amount of the loan. It's not unheard of for a lender to make up for a low nominal interest rate by requiring a certain number of points to "buy down" the interest rate, so this portion of the total closing costs could be higher than it would be with a fixed rate loan of the same size at the current market rate. The only way to tell if this is the case in this instance is to ask the lender. The other portion is made up of things like real estate transfer taxes, title and homeowner insurance payments, pro rata shares of things like real estate taxes, gas/oil/electric bills, survey costs, etc. and would probably remain unchanged even if the house was being paid for in cash.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |