
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 08:17:52 -0800, The Real Bev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Bob Ward wrote: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >It's hard to find a camera with a serial uploading interface now, and >> >there's a reason -- miserable slowness. Make sure you have USB2 >> >capability, even cheesy cameras can't use the older USB ports. >> >> That simply is not so, Bev. By definition, USB 2.0 is backward >> compatible with USB 1.1. If your camera is not, it isn't really USB >> 2.0 > >Sue me. The same camera was invisible to the older machine but loaded >easily with the newer machine. I bought a USB2 card for her machine, I >just haven't put it in yet. > Did the older machine have the correct drivers installed? Windows 98 doesn't ship with as many drivers pre-installed as XP does. This has nothing to do with USB 1.1 or USB 2.0... it is an operating system issue. >> http://www.usb-2-0.com/what-is-usb-2-0.html >> 5. Will USB 2.0 improve the speed of other devices connected to My >> computer? >> No. In order to take advantage of the faster speeds, you must plug in >> a USB 2.0 device into a USB 2.0 compliant computer >> (or a computer that has been recently upgraded to USB 2.0). However, >> as USB 2.0 is fully backward compatible, you will be >> able to use a USB 1.1 device in a USB 2.0 compliant system. > >This does not say that a USB2 device will work on a USB1 machine.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |