Re: Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:37:59 GMT, The Etobian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:37:37 GMT, Victor Smith
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:16:03 GMT, The Etobian
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>I didn't blame the union.  I doubt any union hack was looking beyond
>>>their own nose when doing their job.  But how many union members
>>>resigned in protest from Hughes Electronics Corp. and Loral Space &
>>>Communications Ltd. when it was found they violated US export laws by
>>>selling missile technology to Red China?
>>>
>>WTF?  First you call union members hacks, then encourage them to
>>strike?  Etobian, I don't understand.
>
>If union members were so concerned about their company selling out to
>the Red Chinese, they should have RESIGNED.  Big difference between
>STRIKE and RESIGN.

You don't make sense.  You ask why union members, who knew nothing
of the traitorous activities of Hughes and Loral management, don't
"resign" their jobs in protest.
You want all the union members to resign in protest of the traitorous
activities of Hughes and Loral management, so as to show their
patriotism.
So the same management traitors can then hire non-union workers, and
go about their traitorous activity with Red China?
What even a moderately sensible American would want is for the union
members to strike on the issue of traitorous management, demanding
that all traitors be removed as a condition of returning to work,
stopping the production of the components so that management traitors
can not sell missile components to Red China.
(This is all absurdly assuming there is no FBI, FTC, etc. doing the
job of arresting and prosecuting the management traitors, which I
guess you haven't even considered, being so blinded by your desire to
blame innocent union members for management acts of treason.)
But that strike against treason isn't what you want.  Because a union
striking against management which is committing acts of treason
against the United States of America to the benefit of Red China is a
worse thing for you than the treason itself.
IOW, you never cared about the *treason*, but only *use* that to
castigate innocent union employees for not resigning over management
treason.
For reasons of usenet etiquette, I'm gonna hold off saying in explicit
terms what you have revealed yourself to be.
But if you continue to pester me with your cracker barrel nonsense,
all bets are off.

--Vic