Re: Roberta threatens to stalk *another* child Was: You forgot to cancQ

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In his never ending quest to demonstrate to everyone that
> combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking with
> a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:
>
> > Michael Davis wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In his never ending quest
> >
> >
> > You know what rhymes with quest?
> >
> > TEST
> >
> >
> >>to demonstrate to everyone that
> >>combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking
> >
> >
> > ...and I couldn't have done it without Mike: The drunken, stupid, psycho.
> >
> >
> >>with
> >>a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> > ...some stuff that Mike couldn't have possibly avoided reading.
>
> You post stuff to an open forum in the hope that people *won't*
> read it??? That's kooky!
>
> >
> >
> >>>Pete Charest wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:11:18 GMT, Robert Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>jof3r wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On or about Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:08:02 GMT, it was decided that Robert
> >>>>>>Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>*Transveti-snippage*
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Hey, bitch-bastard.  What's up?  Did your (gay, gender-confused) ass
> >>>>>>ever heal from that spnaking?
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Could you point us to *any* evidence of said "spnaking"???
> >>
> >>Your meltdowns. HTH.
> >
> >
> > I thought you believe I do that by default, no matter what.  Every fucking message 
> > I send, you
> > claim is a meltdown.
>
> Well...Yeah. Just look at them. Normal people don't post the sort
> of frothy idiocy you do.
>
> > I think it's projection by you, IMO.
>
> The opinions of the mentally ill are irrelevant.
>
> >
> > ...but what about the meltdown you and Carl have had ongoing since I sent Jennifer 
> > "childmisery"
> > Wilson that email she asked for on usenet?  Has it been 2 years yet?  She *was* 
> > like 5 years old
> > when I sent it, right?  Last I checked, between proving that Johnny is a Pre-vert 
> > and sending
> > Misery that email, I was met with k0ok-complaints from a Carl Wilson of Lawton, 
> > Okla-homo dressed
> > up in a "j watson" sockpuppet, and lawsuit threats from John Lewis, private 
> > jeweler and appraiser
> > in the Dallas fort worth area.  That doesn't even explain why Carl found himself 
> > sending Pitt
> > complaint emails before I even started doing anything in retaliation.  Pitt 
> > responds telling Carl
> > that he's a k0ok and he can't EVER stop me from saying things he doesn't like to 
> > hear.  They
> > suggested that he not respond to or even read my messages if he wanted to avoid 
> > melting down and
> > making k0ok comaplaints.  Did he do that, Mike?
>
> You still don't get it. You are the problem, Roberta. Blaming your
> victims is just another symptom of your mental illness.
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>Thought not.  HAND
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>"Rick Boston got a kooky quote archive
> >>>>>>and all I got was this lousy gender issue." R. Wolfe?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Hi, it's your daddy... I like to poast as Roberta, Jenny:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>RobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRoberta
> >>>>>etc... etc... etc....
> >>>>
> >>>>Gotta hand it to you J....Less than an hour from your post here and
> >>>>you've got Bobbie Wolfie melting down very nicely.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I know someone else who we'll see melting down... A french-fag named Charest who 
> >>>thinks his
> >>>urine and BO soaked relatives were here during the Revolution.
> >>
> >>I thought you ultra-liberal, anti-war, disloyal, America-hating,
> >>hypocritical, kooks all loved the French these days.
> >
> >
> > You think you know me or something,
>
> Yeah.
>
> > k0ok?  If there's a draft, I'm sure your fat, rolly-polly ass
> > will get to stay at home,
>
> Well, they don't take cross-dressing queers or the mentally ill
> either, so you've got *two* outs, Mr. Hypocrisy.
>
> > so no wonder there why you could care less if we were at war with every
> > *other* country not having anything to do with WTC (besides Iraq, that is).
>
> The war with Iraq is not about the 9/11 attacks. We had plenty of
> other reasons to go into Iraq, and it was way over-due.
>
> >
> >
> >>Anyway, since
> >>the French were on our side during the Revolution, it is just
> >>possible that you have Pete's ancestors to thank for your right to
> >>be a raving net loon.
> >
> >
> > I'm sure I don't.  Do you think that the redcoats wearing RED COATS in the middle 
> > of a damn
> > battle, had much to do with it?
>
> They managed to conquer a world-straddling empire in those get-ups.
>
> > Joe Bloue is supposedly an artillery and munitions expert...
> > What's the maximum effective range of the weapons they were using, "Joe"?  Does 
> > Joe understand
> > how much more visible a soldier wearing any amount of the color red is in *any* 
> > environment
> > (except maybe the painted desert and Death valley)?  Do you, Mike?
>
> I know how inaccurate the weapons of the day were. What they wore
> made little difference. The difference in tactics is what decided
> the outcome of the war.
>
> >
> >
> >>You should thank him. After all, Mad King
> >>George III would never have put up with the likes of you.
> >
> >
> > He had something against those who weren't alive until centuries later?   Maybe he 
> > had a problem
> > with those Austrian Jews who came to the US to escape Hitler so they could kill 
> > themselves mining
> > coal and making the steel to be used in war machinery?  ...
>
> I think you just Godwined yourself.
>
> > or maybe the inbreeding just made him
> > insane?  What was your damn point again, k0ok?  A dead, insane, syphillic King 
> > hates me, now?
> > Are you drinking a lot of mercury, as of late?
> >
> > Besides, my dad has a purple heart from vietnam... "Big Red 1"... I'll thank him 
> > first for his
> > sacrifice,
>
> But you won't emulate him. You must be a great disappointment to
> him. He may as well have had a daughter.
>
> > and next for petitioning his represenatives the second he heard any rumors about 
> > Uncle
> > Scam wanting to start up the draft.  My dad is also intelligent enough to realize 
> > that Saddam
> > Hussien hasn't even been proven to be involved with the WTC incident.
>
> So what?
>
> > He might have voted for
> > Dubya, though... Oh well... he lost fair and square in PA.  If only they knew how 
> > to count in
> > Florida.
>
> We do. Dubbya won in Florida. HTH.
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>It's a talent, definitely.
> >>>>
> >>>>Pete Charest
> >>>>KookSpotter
> >>>>If you're not insulted, you're not a kook.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yeah... Like how Carl and Mike have been melting since I emailed "Miss Misery" 
> >>>herself.
> >>>
> >>>Imagine what they would do if I poasted the link to Carl Jr's Yahoo profile here?
> >>
> >>Threatening to stalk *another* child, Roberta?
> >
> >
> > How is asking Carl a question a "threat", exactly?
>
> Damn, your reading comprehension sucks even when you are parsing
> your own drivel.
>
> >
> > Couple other questions, k0ok: How exactly does one "threaten to stalk"?
>
> See above.
>
> > How is providing a
> > google link "stalking"?
>
> Dragging in non-combatants, and children at that, is clearly
> stalking. Any non psycho can see that.
>
> >
> > Carl has every right to protect his little babies
>
> Why do you think he filed a complaint against you?
>
> > by telling them to not poast their life stories
> > online.  I'm sure that Carl will one day find himself face to face with a verified 
> > dangerous
> > criminal if he continues with the sorts of activities he enjoys doing here and 
> > elsewhere online.
>
> You are going to visit him in person?
>
> > Maybe he'll eventually thank me for having brought this sort of thing to his 
> > attention ahead of
> > time.
>
> Typical psycho-think.
>
> >
> >
> >>Some kooks just
> >>never learn.
> >>
> >
> >
> > What, exactly, did I *learn* from sending Childmisery that email?
>
> Nothing, obviously.
>
> >  Besides her daddy was a
> > verifiable net.k0ok.
>
> You are not her father, you are just her stalker.
>
> >
> >
> >>>Whaddayathink, Carl?  Yes?  No? No answer?  Afraid to talk through your "joe 
> >>>Blowspuppet"?
> >>
> >>And your proof of this is what?
> >>
> >
> >
> > http://www.google.com/groups?selm=T5fWa.1430%24zs.627789835%40newssvr30.news.prodigy.com&output=gplain
> >
> > From: "Joe Bloue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Newsgroups: 
> > alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal.crop-circles,alt.usenet.kooks
> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Mikey is a fat k0ok who can't admit when he is clearly incorrect!
> > Lines: 31
> > X-Priority: 3
> > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.66.15.48
> > X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X-Trace: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com 1059683827 ST000 65.66.15.48 (Thu, 31 Jul 2003 
> > 16:37:07 EDT)
> > NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:37:07 EDT
> > Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
> > X-UserInfo1:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
> > PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:37:07 GMT
> >
> > Anybody out there *not* see 65.66.15.48 located in okcyok?
>
> Yeah, and? You have a long history of jumping to stupid
> assumptions about who is who's sock puppet. What are the odds you
> will be right this time?
>
> > Note the progression of "Joe's"
> > Headers from this point on toward more anonymity... Note that he showed up a few 
> > days after
> > Carl's "test" message...which he seems to have *canceled* yesterday for some 
> > reason (not even in
> > google anymore).  Note that he was also recently trolled by a poast with the 
> > subject "Whatever
> > happened to Carl Wilson?".  Another good indicator is the fact that you are acting 
> > so
> > nonchalantly.  Usually you flip out completely when I play the sockpuppet 
> > accusation game
> > knowingly feeding you incorrect information.  (You thought I was just stupid, huh?)
>
> No, I always knew you were so much more than just stupid.
>
> >  Your
> > reaction this time points to a different scenario.  Gotta love misdirection, eh?
>
> What reaction?
>
> >
> > One can also ask the following questions:
> >
> > Has Joe ever denied being Carl?
>
> Have you ever denied stuffing small rodents up your rectum?
>
> >  Has Carl ever used sockpuppets before?
>
> Like you have?
>
> > Why are you so *sure* it
> > isn't Carl?
>
> I never claimed it either is or isn't Carl.
>
> > Why is Michael Davis asking for proof,
>
> That's what debunkers do. HTH.
>
> > when you'd expect Joe Bloue to be the first
> > needing an explanation for such an "incorrect" assumption(if he really *wasn't* 
> > Carl, that is)?
>
> Or if he has no idea who Carl is and is used to paranoid kooks
> accusing him of being random people who don't post here anymore.
> See, there is always more than one possible explanation for
> something. You saucer heads just can't seem to grasp that.
>
> >
> > So I guess, you could call all of that my supporting evidence as to why I 
> > hypothesize that Joe
> > Bloue is Carl...
>
> You misspelled "fantasize."
>
> > Along with more support that you guys will surely give out unknowingly.  Why do
> > you even bother to set up private clubs like you guys do, when they don't even 
> > help you avoid
> > getting caught up in your own stupid lies and games?
>
> It's not private. Anyone can join. We just charge psychos like you
> annual dues of $50000 to cover the potential liability. Send me a
> check (a good one) for the above amount and I'll hook you up.
>
> >
> >
> >>>What gives?  I thought you wanted to play some more k0ok games?
> >>
> >>You are the only one I see playing kook games, kook.
> >>
> >
> >
> > ...and you're sooo surprised to see them because you are downloading them, reading 
> > them, and
> > responding to them.
>
> Yep, it's still an open, public forum. Why you are surprised that
> people read and respond to you is beyond me, but then I'm not a kook.
>
> > I move then you move... Like chess...  HTH
> >
> > I see Carl using a sock... I see Johnny Lewis using a sock...  kook-watch says 
> > K0oks use
> > sockpuppets.
>
> It says that kooks use sock puppets to respond to themselves. and
> bolster their own arguments. There are non kooky reasons to use
> sock puppets. Staying anonymous when dealing with net psychos like
> you is just one example.
>
> >  Case closed, k0oks.
> >
> > http://know_buddy.tripod.com
> >
> >
> >>>MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
> >>>
> >>>test test test
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>test
> >>>
> >>>test
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>test
> >>
> >>You failed.
> >
> >
> > I wasn't testing *me*.
>
> I was.
>
> >  Try again,
>
> Ok, you fail again.
>
> > k0ok.... [test]  You'll see that you pass the test with flying
> > colors every time.  You'll continue to do this ad-nauseum, and complain about it 
> > when all you had
> > to do was just *try* to avoid hearing what I have to say.  TEST
> >
> >
> >>You're still a kook. HTH.
> >
> >
> > ^test^
> >
> > (test 1234)
> >
> > test test test {}
> >
> > test foo("test");
> >
> > <test>HTH</test>
> >
> > You're still responding to things you claim are unintelligible.  Would base64 be 
> > better?
> >
> >
> >>
> >>--
> >>The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
> >>http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
> >>http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
> >>Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
> >>
> >>"I have no clue" - Roberta Wolfe in a rare moment of honesty.
> >
> >
> > (((test]]]
> >
> > --
> > Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
> >
> > *test*
>
> Yet another great meltdown! You go, kook
>


Yawn.