Re: Roberta threatens to stalk *another* child Was: You forgot to cancela few others Carl...

In his never ending quest to demonstrate to everyone that 
combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking with 
a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:

> Michael Davis wrote:
>
>
> > In his never ending quest
>
>
> You know what rhymes with quest?
>
> TEST
>
>
> > to demonstrate to everyone that
> > combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking
>
>
> ...and I couldn't have done it without Mike: The drunken, stupid, psycho.
>
>
> > with
> > a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:
>
>
> ...some stuff that Mike couldn't have possibly avoided reading.

You post stuff to an open forum in the hope that people *won't* 
read it??? That's kooky!

> > > Pete Charest wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:11:18 GMT, Robert Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > jof3r wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On or about Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:08:02 GMT, it was decided that Robert
> > > > > > Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Transveti-snippage*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey, bitch-bastard.  What's up?  Did your (gay, gender-confused) ass
> > > > > > ever heal from that spnaking?
> > >
> > >
> > > Could you point us to *any* evidence of said "spnaking"???
> >
> > Your meltdowns. HTH.
>
>
> I thought you believe I do that by default, no matter what.  Every fucking message I send, you
> claim is a meltdown. 

Well...Yeah. Just look at them. Normal people don't post the sort 
of frothy idiocy you do.

> I think it's projection by you, IMO.

The opinions of the mentally ill are irrelevant.

> ...but what about the meltdown you and Carl have had ongoing since I sent Jennifer 
> "childmisery"
> Wilson that email she asked for on usenet?  Has it been 2 years yet?  She *was* like 5 
> years old
> when I sent it, right?  Last I checked, between proving that Johnny is a Pre-vert and 
> sending
> Misery that email, I was met with k0ok-complaints from a Carl Wilson of Lawton, 
> Okla-homo dressed
> up in a "j watson" sockpuppet, and lawsuit threats from John Lewis, private jeweler 
> and appraiser
> in the Dallas fort worth area.  That doesn't even explain why Carl found himself 
> sending Pitt
> complaint emails before I even started doing anything in retaliation.  Pitt responds 
> telling Carl
> that he's a k0ok and he can't EVER stop me from saying things he doesn't like to hear. 
>  They
> suggested that he not respond to or even read my messages if he wanted to avoid 
> melting down and
> making k0ok comaplaints.  Did he do that, Mike?

You still don't get it. You are the problem, Roberta. Blaming your 
victims is just another symptom of your mental illness.

> > > Thought not.  HAND
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > "Rick Boston got a kooky quote archive
> > > > > > and all I got was this lousy gender issue." R. Wolfe?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, it's your daddy... I like to poast as Roberta, Jenny:
> > > > >
> > > > > RobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRoberta
> > > > > etc... etc... etc....
> > > >
> > > > Gotta hand it to you J....Less than an hour from your post here and
> > > > you've got Bobbie Wolfie melting down very nicely.
> > >
> > >
> > > I know someone else who we'll see melting down... A french-fag named Charest who 
> > > thinks his
> > > urine and BO soaked relatives were here during the Revolution.
> >
> > I thought you ultra-liberal, anti-war, disloyal, America-hating,
> > hypocritical, kooks all loved the French these days.
>
>
> You think you know me or something,

Yeah.

> k0ok?  If there's a draft, I'm sure your fat, rolly-polly ass
> will get to stay at home,

Well, they don't take cross-dressing queers or the mentally ill 
either, so you've got *two* outs, Mr. Hypocrisy.

> so no wonder there why you could care less if we were at war with every
> *other* country not having anything to do with WTC (besides Iraq, that is).

The war with Iraq is not about the 9/11 attacks. We had plenty of 
other reasons to go into Iraq, and it was way over-due.

> > Anyway, since
> > the French were on our side during the Revolution, it is just
> > possible that you have Pete's ancestors to thank for your right to
> > be a raving net loon.
>
>
> I'm sure I don't.  Do you think that the redcoats wearing RED COATS in the middle of a 
> damn
> battle, had much to do with it?

They managed to conquer a world-straddling empire in those get-ups.

> Joe Bloue is supposedly an artillery and munitions expert...
> What's the maximum effective range of the weapons they were using, "Joe"?  Does Joe 
> understand
> how much more visible a soldier wearing any amount of the color red is in *any* 
> environment
> (except maybe the painted desert and Death valley)?  Do you, Mike?

I know how inaccurate the weapons of the day were. What they wore 
made little difference. The difference in tactics is what decided 
the outcome of the war.

> > You should thank him. After all, Mad King
> > George III would never have put up with the likes of you.
>
>
> He had something against those who weren't alive until centuries later?   Maybe he had 
> a problem
> with those Austrian Jews who came to the US to escape Hitler so they could kill 
> themselves mining
> coal and making the steel to be used in war machinery?  ...

I think you just Godwined yourself.

> or maybe the inbreeding just made him
> insane?  What was your damn point again, k0ok?  A dead, insane, syphillic King hates 
> me, now?
> Are you drinking a lot of mercury, as of late?
>
> Besides, my dad has a purple heart from vietnam... "Big Red 1"... I'll thank him first 
> for his
> sacrifice,

But you won't emulate him. You must be a great disappointment to 
him. He may as well have had a daughter.

> and next for petitioning his represenatives the second he heard any rumors about Uncle
> Scam wanting to start up the draft.  My dad is also intelligent enough to realize that 
> Saddam
> Hussien hasn't even been proven to be involved with the WTC incident.

So what?

> He might have voted for
> Dubya, though... Oh well... he lost fair and square in PA.  If only they knew how to 
> count in
> Florida.

We do. Dubbya won in Florida. HTH.

> > > > It's a talent, definitely.
> > > >
> > > > Pete Charest
> > > > KookSpotter
> > > > If you're not insulted, you're not a kook.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah... Like how Carl and Mike have been melting since I emailed "Miss Misery" herself.
> > >
> > > Imagine what they would do if I poasted the link to Carl Jr's Yahoo profile here?
> >
> > Threatening to stalk *another* child, Roberta?
>
>
> How is asking Carl a question a "threat", exactly?

Damn, your reading comprehension sucks even when you are parsing 
your own drivel.

> Couple other questions, k0ok: How exactly does one "threaten to stalk"? 

See above.

> How is providing a
> google link "stalking"?

Dragging in non-combatants, and children at that, is clearly 
stalking. Any non psycho can see that.

> Carl has every right to protect his little babies

Why do you think he filed a complaint against you?

> by telling them to not poast their life stories
> online.  I'm sure that Carl will one day find himself face to face with a verified 
> dangerous
> criminal if he continues with the sorts of activities he enjoys doing here and 
> elsewhere online.

You are going to visit him in person?

> Maybe he'll eventually thank me for having brought this sort of thing to his attention 
> ahead of
> time.

Typical psycho-think.

> > Some kooks just
> > never learn.
>
>
> What, exactly, did I *learn* from sending Childmisery that email?

Nothing, obviously.

>  Besides her daddy was a
> verifiable net.k0ok.

You are not her father, you are just her stalker.

> > > Whaddayathink, Carl?  Yes?  No? No answer?  Afraid to talk through your "joe Blowspuppet"?
> >
> > And your proof of this is what?
>
>
> http://www.google.com/groups?selm=T5fWa.1430%24zs.627789835%40newssvr30.news.prodigy.com&output=gplain
>
> From: "Joe Bloue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: 
> alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal.crop-circles,alt.usenet.kooks
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Mikey is a fat k0ok who can't admit when he is clearly incorrect!
> Lines: 31
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.66.15.48
> X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Trace: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com 1059683827 ST000 65.66.15.48 (Thu, 31 Jul 2003 
> 16:37:07 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:37:07 EDT
> Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
> X-UserInfo1:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:37:07 GMT
>
> Anybody out there *not* see 65.66.15.48 located in okcyok? 

Yeah, and? You have a long history of jumping to stupid 
assumptions about who is who's sock puppet. What are the odds you 
will be right this time?

> Note the progression of "Joe's"
> Headers from this point on toward more anonymity... Note that he showed up a few days 
> after
> Carl's "test" message...which he seems to have *canceled* yesterday for some reason 
> (not even in
> google anymore).  Note that he was also recently trolled by a poast with the subject 
> "Whatever
> happened to Carl Wilson?".  Another good indicator is the fact that you are acting so
> nonchalantly.  Usually you flip out completely when I play the sockpuppet accusation 
> game
> knowingly feeding you incorrect information.  (You thought I was just stupid, huh?)

No, I always knew you were so much more than just stupid.

>  Your
> reaction this time points to a different scenario.  Gotta love misdirection, eh?

What reaction?

> One can also ask the following questions:
>
> Has Joe ever denied being Carl?

Have you ever denied stuffing small rodents up your rectum?

>  Has Carl ever used sockpuppets before?

Like you have?

> Why are you so *sure* it
> isn't Carl?

I never claimed it either is or isn't Carl.

> Why is Michael Davis asking for proof,

That's what debunkers do. HTH.

> when you'd expect Joe Bloue to be the first
> needing an explanation for such an "incorrect" assumption(if he really *wasn't* Carl, 
> that is)?

Or if he has no idea who Carl is and is used to paranoid kooks 
accusing him of being random people who don't post here anymore. 
See, there is always more than one possible explanation for 
something. You saucer heads just can't seem to grasp that.

> So I guess, you could call all of that my supporting evidence as to why I 
> hypothesize that Joe
> Bloue is Carl...

You misspelled "fantasize."

> Along with more support that you guys will surely give out unknowingly.  Why do
> you even bother to set up private clubs like you guys do, when they don't even help 
> you avoid
> getting caught up in your own stupid lies and games?

It's not private. Anyone can join. We just charge psychos like you 
annual dues of $50000 to cover the potential liability. Send me a 
check (a good one) for the above amount and I'll hook you up.

> > > What gives?  I thought you wanted to play some more k0ok games?
> >
> > You are the only one I see playing kook games, kook.
>
>
> ...and you're sooo surprised to see them because you are downloading them, reading 
> them, and
> responding to them.

Yep, it's still an open, public forum. Why you are surprised that 
people read and respond to you is beyond me, but then I'm not a kook.

> I move then you move... Like chess...  HTH
>
> I see Carl using a sock... I see Johnny Lewis using a sock...  kook-watch says K0oks 
> use
> sockpuppets.

It says that kooks use sock puppets to respond to themselves. and 
bolster their own arguments. There are non kooky reasons to use 
sock puppets. Staying anonymous when dealing with net psychos like 
you is just one example.

>  Case closed, k0oks.
>
> http://know_buddy.tripod.com
>
>
> > > MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
> > >
> > > test test test
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > test
> > >
> > > test
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > test
> >
> > You failed.
>
>
> I wasn't testing *me*.

I was.

>  Try again,

Ok, you fail again.

> k0ok.... [test]  You'll see that you pass the test with flying
> colors every time.  You'll continue to do this ad-nauseum, and complain about it when 
> all you had
> to do was just *try* to avoid hearing what I have to say.  TEST
>
>
> > You're still a kook. HTH.
>
>
> ^test^
>
> (test 1234)
>
> test test test {}
>
> test foo("test");
>
> <test>HTH</test>
>
> You're still responding to things you claim are unintelligible.  Would base64 be better?
>
>
> > --
> > The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
> > http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
> > http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
> > Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
> >
> > "I have no clue" - Roberta Wolfe in a rare moment of honesty.
>
>
> (((test]]]
>
> --
> Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
>
> *test*

Yet another great meltdown! You go, kook

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"I have no clue" - Roberta Wolfe in a rare moment of honesty.