Re: Roberta threatens to stalk *another* child Was: You forgot to cancQ

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Michael Davis wrote:
>
> > In his never ending quest
>
> You know what rhymes with quest?
>
> TEST
>
> > to demonstrate to everyone that
> > combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking
>
> ...and I couldn't have done it without Mike: The drunken, stupid, psycho.
>
> > with
> > a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:
> >
>
> ...some stuff that Mike couldn't have possibly avoided reading.
>
> >
> > > Pete Charest wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:11:18 GMT, Robert Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>jof3r wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>On or about Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:08:02 GMT, it was decided that Robert
> > >>>>Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *Transveti-snippage*
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hey, bitch-bastard.  What's up?  Did your (gay, gender-confused) ass
> > >>>>ever heal from that spnaking?
> > >>>>
> > >
> > >
> > > Could you point us to *any* evidence of said "spnaking"???
> >
> > Your meltdowns. HTH.
>
> I thought you believe I do that by default, no matter what.  Every fucking message I 
> send, you
> claim is a meltdown.  I think it's projection by you, IMO.
>
> ...but what about the meltdown you and Carl have had ongoing since I sent Jennifer 
> "childmisery"
> Wilson that email she asked for on usenet?  Has it been 2 years yet?  She *was* like 
> 5 years old
> when I sent it, right?  Last I checked, between proving that Johnny is a Pre-vert 
> and sending
> Misery that email, I was met with k0ok-complaints from a Carl Wilson of Lawton, 
> Okla-homo dressed
> up in a "j watson" sockpuppet, and lawsuit threats from John Lewis, private jeweler 
> and appraiser
> in the Dallas fort worth area.  That doesn't even explain why Carl found himself 
> sending Pitt
> complaint emails before I even started doing anything in retaliation.  Pitt responds 
> telling Carl
> that he's a k0ok and he can't EVER stop me from saying things he doesn't like to 
> hear.  They
> suggested that he not respond to or even read my messages if he wanted to avoid 
> melting down and
> making k0ok comaplaints.  Did he do that, Mike?
>
> >
> >
> > > Thought not.  HAND
> > >
> > >
> > >>>>"Rick Boston got a kooky quote archive
> > >>>>and all I got was this lousy gender issue." R. Wolfe?
> > >>>
> > >>>Hi, it's your daddy... I like to poast as Roberta, Jenny:
> > >>>
> > >>>RobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRoberta
> > >>>etc... etc... etc....
> > >>
> > >>Gotta hand it to you J....Less than an hour from your post here and
> > >>you've got Bobbie Wolfie melting down very nicely.
> > >
> > >
> > > I know someone else who we'll see melting down... A french-fag named Charest who 
> > > thinks his
> > > urine and BO soaked relatives were here during the Revolution.
> >
> > I thought you ultra-liberal, anti-war, disloyal, America-hating,
> > hypocritical, kooks all loved the French these days.
>
> You think you know me or something, k0ok?  If there's a draft, I'm sure your fat, 
> rolly-polly ass
> will get to stay at home, so no wonder there why you could care less if we were at 
> war with every
> *other* country not having anything to do with WTC (besides Iraq, that is).
>
> > Anyway, since
> > the French were on our side during the Revolution, it is just
> > possible that you have Pete's ancestors to thank for your right to
> > be a raving net loon.
>
> I'm sure I don't.  Do you think that the redcoats wearing RED COATS in the middle of 
> a damn
> battle, had much to do with it?  Joe Bloue is supposedly an artillery and munitions 
> expert...
> What's the maximum effective range of the weapons they were using, "Joe"?  Does Joe 
> understand
> how much more visible a soldier wearing any amount of the color red is in *any* 
> environment
> (except maybe the painted desert and Death valley)?  Do you, Mike?
>
> > You should thank him. After all, Mad King
> > George III would never have put up with the likes of you.
>
> He had something against those who weren't alive until centuries later?  Maybe he 
> had a problem
> with those Austrian Jews who came to the US to escape Hitler so they could kill 
> themselves mining
> coal and making the steel to be used in war machinery?  ...or maybe the inbreeding 
> just made him
> insane?  What was your damn point again, k0ok?  A dead, insane, syphillic King hates 
> me, now?
> Are you drinking a lot of mercury, as of late?
>
> Besides, my dad has a purple heart from vietnam... "Big Red 1"... I'll thank him 
> first for his
> sacrifice, and next for petitioning his represenatives the second he heard any 
> rumors about Uncle
> Scam wanting to start up the draft.  My dad is also intelligent enough to realize 
> that Saddam
> Hussien hasn't even been proven to be involved with the WTC incident.  He might have 
> voted for
> Dubya, though... Oh well... he lost fair and square in PA.  If only they knew how to 
> count in
> Florida.
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>It's a talent, definitely.
> > >>
> > >>Pete Charest
> > >>KookSpotter
> > >>If you're not insulted, you're not a kook.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah... Like how Carl and Mike have been melting since I emailed "Miss Misery" 
> > > herself.
> > >
> > > Imagine what they would do if I poasted the link to Carl Jr's Yahoo profile here?
> >
> > Threatening to stalk *another* child, Roberta?
>
> How is asking Carl a question a "threat", exactly?
>
> Couple other questions, k0ok: How exactly does one "threaten to stalk"?  How is 
> providing a
> google link "stalking"?
>
> Carl has every right to protect his little babies by telling them to not poast their 
> life stories
> online.  I'm sure that Carl will one day find himself face to face with a verified 
> dangerous
> criminal if he continues with the sorts of activities he enjoys doing here and 
> elsewhere online.
> Maybe he'll eventually thank me for having brought this sort of thing to his 
> attention ahead of
> time.
>
> > Some kooks just
> > never learn.
> >
>
> What, exactly, did I *learn* from sending Childmisery that email?  Besides her daddy 
> was a
> verifiable net.k0ok.
>
> >
> > > Whaddayathink, Carl?  Yes?  No? No answer?  Afraid to talk through your "joe 
> > > Blowspuppet"?
> >
> > And your proof of this is what?
> >
>
> http://www.google.com/groups?selm=T5fWa.1430%24zs.627789835%40newssvr30.news.prodigy.com&output=gplain
>
> From: "Joe Bloue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: 
> alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal.crop-circles,alt.usenet.kooks
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Mikey is a fat k0ok who can't admit when he is clearly incorrect!
> Lines: 31
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.66.15.48
> X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Trace: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com 1059683827 ST000 65.66.15.48 (Thu, 31 Jul 2003 
> 16:37:07 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:37:07 EDT
> Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
> X-UserInfo1:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:37:07 GMT
>
> Anybody out there *not* see 65.66.15.48 located in okcyok?  Note the progression of 
> "Joe's"
> Headers from this point on toward more anonymity... Note that he showed up a few 
> days after
> Carl's "test" message...which he seems to have *canceled* yesterday for some reason 
> (not even in
> google anymore).  Note that he was also recently trolled by a poast with the subject 
> "Whatever
> happened to Carl Wilson?".  Another good indicator is the fact that you are acting so
> nonchalantly.  Usually you flip out completely when I play the sockpuppet accusation 
> game
> knowingly feeding you incorrect information.  (You thought I was just stupid, huh?)  
> Your
> reaction this time points to a different scenario.  Gotta love misdirection, eh?
>
> One can also ask the following questions:
>
> Has Joe ever denied being Carl?  Has Carl ever used sockpuppets before?  Why are you 
> so *sure* it
> isn't Carl?  Why is Michael Davis asking for proof, when you'd expect Joe Bloue to 
> be the first
> needing an explanation for such an "incorrect" assumption(if he really *wasn't* 
> Carl, that is)?
>
> So I guess, you could call all of that my supporting evidence as to why I 
> hypothesize that Joe
> Bloue is Carl...  Along with more support that you guys will surely give out 
> unknowingly.  Why do
> you even bother to set up private clubs like you guys do, when they don't even help 
> you avoid
> getting caught up in your own stupid lies and games?
>
> >
> > > What gives?  I thought you wanted to play some more k0ok games?
> >
> > You are the only one I see playing kook games, kook.
> >
>
> ...and you're sooo surprised to see them because you are downloading them, reading 
> them, and
> responding to them.  I move then you move... Like chess...  HTH
>
> I see Carl using a sock... I see Johnny Lewis using a sock...  kook-watch says K0oks 
> use
> sockpuppets.  Case closed, k0oks.
>
> http://know_buddy.tripod.com
>
> >
> > >
> > > MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
> > >
> > > test test test
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > test
> > >
> > > test
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > test
> >
> > You failed.
>
> I wasn't testing *me*.  Try again, k0ok.... [test]  You'll see that you pass the 
> test with flying
> colors every time.  You'll continue to do this ad-nauseum, and complain about it 
> when all you had
> to do was just *try* to avoid hearing what I have to say.  TEST
>
> > You're still a kook. HTH.
>
> ^test^
>
> (test 1234)
>
> test test test {}
>
> test foo("test");
>
> <test>HTH</test>
>
> You're still responding to things you claim are unintelligible.  Would base64 be 
> better?
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
> > http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
> > http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
> > Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
> >
> > "I have no clue" - Roberta Wolfe in a rare moment of honesty.
>
> (((test]]]
>
> --
> Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
>
> *test*


??