
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Nicaragua Network Hotline November 10, 2003 This hotline is prepared from the Nicaragua News Service and other sources. To receive a more extensive weekly summary of the news from Nicaragua by e-mail or postal service, send a check for $60.00 to Nicaragua Network, 1247 E St., SE, Washington, DC 20003. We can be reached by phone at 202-544-9355. Our web site is: www.nicanet.org Topics included in this hotline are: Powell's Heavy-Hand Irritates Nicaraguans & Solidarity Activists, Ortega Gambling Everything to Return to Power?, and, Nemagon Witness Claims US Transnationals Forced Testimony Change TOPIC 1: Powell's Heavy-Hand Irritates Nicaraguans & Solidarity Activists Secretary of State Colin Powell's overnight visit to Nicaragua stirred up a hornet's nest there and in the US, especially among progressives who thought Powell was "liberal" or a "voice of moderation." Even La Prensa compared Powell to Secretary of State Philander Knox who, at the beginning of the last century delivered a letter to Nicaraguan President Jose Zelaya requiring him to step down. Powell warned all "democratic forces" to get themselves together, but without the controversial former president and leader of the Liberal Constitutionalist Party (PLC), currently in jail. Leandro Marin, Secretary to the Presidency, revealed that the US message had been "clear and unequivocal, dramatic and direct," calling on the various Liberal and Conservative political parties to leave their differences aside and to unify their efforts in order to defeat the Sandinistas in the coming electoral struggles. "It was a directly political message; very clear," he said. "Mr. Powell told us, 'Unite among yourselves. Forget about Seqor Aleman. Don't climb up on his bandwagon. The United States will wash its hands of anyone who does so. That person will burn'." Marin clarified that, while Powell had called for the unification of what he termed "all democratic forces," he stressed most particularly the bringing together of all Liberal parties of whatever stripe. Others present at the meeting with Powell concurred. They included National Assembly members Jaime Cuadra, Miguel Lopez y Oscar Moncada, all from among the Liberal tendencies, and the current president of the Conservative Party, Mario Rappaccioli. Marin also revealed that Powell had dismissed any idea of a electoral victory for the Sandinista Front, "since he considered that the 'democratic forces' will strengthen their unification and therefore carry the next elections. On the plane home, Powell rewrote history when he told journalists, as reported in the Washington Post, that Nicaragua "had 11 straight years of the worst kind of leadership under the Sandinistas, with a totally communist-oriented, state-controlled environment where the leaders thought all they had to keep doing was printing money. They created a society of dependency in the government and the government funded it by debt and money." He also bragged about going to Congress when he was deputy national security advisor and fighting all night long with opponents of contra aid, to keep these guys alive and going with food and ammunition." "And there was enormous opposition: How dare us do something like this!" Powell said. "It was a difficult period. But we got through it." Thirty to forty thousand Nicaraguans didn't "get through it" thanks to US funding of the contra war. The Nicaragua Network sent out an alert on November 6 calling on activists to call the State Department to object to Powell's statements and to demand that the US stop interfering in Nicaragua's democratic process. The direct line to the Secretary of State is 202-647-9572 and the fax is 202-647-2283. The address is Secretary of State Colin Powell, US Department of State, 2201 C St. NW, Washington DC 20520. In other fallout from Powell's visit, Jan Hartman, public affairs officer of the US Embassy in Managua, has been relieved of her duties for being a little too truthful. A briefing Hartman prepared for foreign journalists on the eve of Powell's visit was regarded as "damaging" for Nicaragua by the country's authorities. They were so incensed by the contents of the release that they called on US Ambassador, Barbara Moore, to administer an "exemplary sanction" to Hartman. This was just short of Nicaragua declaring her "persona non grata." In the briefing, Hartman described Nicaraguan daily life as, "The majority of the people are wholly absorbed in the struggle to find their next serving of rice and beans; in consequence, they have little time to be thinking about the United States and/or global matters in general." Those Nicaraguans who do look to the US, "prefer to dress themselves in Ralph Lauren clothes, drive Ford all-terrain vehicles, watch US movies and, when they go out, boast of eating at TGI Fridays," she wrote. On the other hand, "Many who opposed the Sandinistas, and who either fled to the USA while the latter were in power or have relatives still living there who send them money regularly, regard the US with suspicion. Many people believe the USA betrayed the contra resistance forces by never giving them sufficient support during the war and then dropping them like hot potatoes once they were no longer required as fighters against communism. They also felt deceived when the US promised a great deal of aid to Nicaragua if the Sandinistas should lose the 1990 elections, a promise that was never realized even though the Sandinista Front did in fact lose and was ejected from power." The document concluded by stating baldly, "The leaders see the United States as an egotistical neighbor, someone who lives quite close but drives a bigger vehicle, has a fancier house, sends the children to the best schools, and has no time even to talk with a less well-off neighbor, let alone concern him or herself with that neighbor." We at the Nicaragua Network hope that Hartman enjoys her next posting to Lapland. The other storm that Powell stirred up while in Nicaragua was to increase US pressure on Nicaragua to give up its SAM-7 missiles. Army Chief Javier Carrion made it clear to Powell that his forces were "better off with surface-to-air missiles (SAM-7s) than without them." He also asked pointedly why the US seemed to be singling Nicaragua out in its determination to get rid of these particular weapons when, in fact, other countries within Latin America also possessed them. He reiterated Nicaragua's position that they would only give up the missiles as part of comprehensive Central American force balancing agreement. TOPIC 2: Ortega Gambling Everything to Return to Power? Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega, Secretary of State Powell's boogieman, has caused much speculation as to why he suddenly proposed that next year's municipal elections should be delayed to coincide with the presidential and national elections of 2006. He had recently announced an agreement with other parties in the Democratic Convergence for the allocation of Mayor and Vice-Mayor nominations in all the municipalities which are scheduled for election in 2004. The ostensible reason offered by the former president was that of economic necessity. The municipal elections appear to be in serious financial trouble, according to several recent reports. However, a growing body of opinion suggests that the real basis for Ortega's proposal is that the Sandinistas fear a repeat of the phenomenon in the last electoral cycle when anti-Sandinista parties closed ranks to defeat Ortega in the presidential election after the FSLN's near sweep of the most important municipal elections. Polls indicate that the FSLN would have similar success in next year's municipal elections and speculation is that Ortega fears going down in flames for the fourth straight time, if the pattern repeats. At present, incumbent mayors will hand over power in January of 2005. Ortega's proposal would give them two more years in office, a possibility that pleases most incumbents just as it offends some FSLN and Convergence candidates for 2004. However, it would also require significant electoral and constitutional reforms, sufficient in themselves to set Liberal and Conservative alarm bells ringing. Analysts such as Carlos Tunnerman and Cairo Manuel Lopez regard the Sandinistas as being in a strong position at the present time, particularly given the current disarray in Liberal ranks. They believe Ortega is indeed gambling everything on one last throw. Meanwhile, within the party, Alejandro Martinez Cuenca, former Minister of the Economy with the Sandinista government and one of the challengers to Ortega for the FSLN's presidential candidacy in 2001, challenged the Sandinista leadership to "open themselves up to new possibilities." He called on them to "overcome their fear of change," and to "demystify the figure of Ortega." While he freely admitted that Ortega has "an unquestionable leadership," this does not mean that "he has to conduct the orchestra until the last instrument has sounded." Martinez Cuenca confirmed his intention to run against Ortega for the FSLN candidacy a second time. "It's the people themselves who are demanding that the political parties open up," he observed. "The fear of change comes from the fact that even the party hierarchs are uncertain; each one has a certain sphere of power, allowed him through his relationship with the overall leader. The great dilemma for them is whether or not they can maintain these in the face of other changes. Somehow we have to convince them that their fears are unfounded, and that, overall, it would be greatly to the leadership's benefit to adopt a more democratic stance. We've heard over and again that Daniel Ortega is the only one who connects with the Sandinista base. This argument's worn out. It's served to prevent change. The popular consultations of the past have taught us a lot. Today we can no longer permit that the people's will be subverted through the manipulation of the Sandinista Assembly. Although a primary election is risky, it's much better than the appointment from on high." TOPIC 3: Nemagon Witness Claims US Transnationals Forced Testimony Change Bayardo Jose Barrios, a medical technician who gave damaging evidence against the plaintiffs in the banana workers' lawsuit for compensation for lives blighted by the application of Nemagon, formally accused representatives of the Dow, Dole, and Shell, the defendants in the case, of forcing him to bear false witness. Speaking before officials of the Ministry of Government, he claimed that lawyers and staff members of the multinational companies involved as defendants in the suit, had kidnapped him and threatened him unless he changed his original finding for the banana workers in new testimony before the US courts. Barrios is the proprietor of the Chinandega Barrios Clinic, where affected banana workers were examined and tested. According to his new deposition, he was kidnapped, taken to Honduras, and there, under continued threat and abuse, was forced to sign a document which claimed that he had falsified the clinic's original findings which determined that the workers had indeed been affected by the chemical pesticide. Barrios's findings are key to the workers' claim; they are seeking compensation to the tune of US$17 billion; and any retraction before the US courts would have dealt their hopes a death blow. In his detailed statement before the ministerial officials, Barrios named a Mexican-American, Joseph Q. Carrera and his supposed wife, Marma Elena, as his abductors. He claimed that they presented themselves to him as CIA and FBI agents respectively, and, with them he went voluntarily to the Honduras Maya Hotel, situated right across the street from the offices of Standard Fruit Company in Tegucigalpa, the Honduran capital. There he was interviewed by the Dole Fruit Company's legal representative, Fernando Medina, and there, "given the promise of thousands of US dollars," he was forced to sign a document prepared by the lawyers in question, in which he "confessed" to the falsification of the original evidence. Once that document had been signed, Barrios was taken first to Costa Rica and then to Dallas, where he was briefed for an appearance before a Californian court. He fled from there back to Nicaragua, where he went into hiding, only emerging to take the stand again against the plaintiffs. In the light of his new testimony, Barrios called for a government investigation into the conduct of his kidnappers, and for them to be charged with abduction and threats of force. Lawyer Medina acknowledged that his clients had paid for the Honduran, Costa Rican and US journeys. He also recognized that he had been present when Barrios testified in Costa Rica and Honduras, "for ten hours, but without any threats," he claimed, although admitting that Barrios had disappeared from the hotel, "for no apparent reason." Medina also claimed not to know any of the others accused by Barrios. ********** To subscribe to this Hotline, send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the address which should receive the Hotline. To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |