Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Misc Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Pigsource Bitches About Pothier Right Here



Joseph Pothier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>What I particularly like about the idea is that it respects Wizard's
>right to lie

Is it a lie when I cite the following items of yours? If not, then how is it
that you think it is more noble when *you* engage in such hate vs your cohorts
in the Aryan Nations who do the same? in "Re: Atlanta - Pipe Bomb. Militia to
get the blame" on 1996/08/06 you wrote:

  "TELL ME MORMON **BOY** ABOUT THAT UNDERWARE YOU WARE."

And in "Re: OUTLAW the MILITIA!" on 1996/08/06 "Pothier" wrote:

   "Boy, you just called me boy! ***ARE YOU A MORMON, 
  BOY?**** TELL ME ***BOY*** WHAT IS THIS I HEAR
   ABOUT YOUNG MORMON WOMEN BEING INTERESTED 
  IN SOME SORT OF UNDERWARE YOU ***BOYS*** ARE 
  SUPPOSED TO KEEP ON ALL THE TIME. AND WHILE 
  WE ARE AT IT ***BOY*** JUST HOW MANY WIVES DO
  YOUINS' PLAN ON HAVIN'.

These are only two instances of literally DOZENS where you employed religious
hate, "Pothier." And don't whine about your purported apology. That pitiful
mewling sounded like something a KKKer would say. It went along the lines of:

In "Re: What's in a Name?" on 1996/08/10

  "Personally I have nothing against Mormons. One of my
  best friends is one, that is how I knew about the underware
  thing. Mr. Perry Eidelbus chose to deliberately insult me by
  calling me a 'boy.'

And what is it with you and this "boy" thing, boy? You're not African-American.
You've said as much. Most *real* men don't go nearly that ballistic over such a
tiny issue, though some convicts do. Expecially those with Aryan involvements.
But I won't speculate on that beyond merely noting that your use of religious
hate was totally inappropriate to your pretended affront.

Besides, you had quite a pattern of using religion as a tool of hate. Just like
the Aryan Nations boys. Now why, "Pothier," do you think it appropriate for you
to use such tools but it would be inappropriate for the AN? Or are you claiming
that it's also appropriate for your cohorts in the neo-nazi groups? Are you
that much in love with hate? Perhaps so.

Sure. I could be all wrong on this. But it is also interesting to note that of
all the antis who have been active here, you have only a tiny, cult-like
following. And those are voices nearly as shrill and extreme as your own.
Extreme conservatives like Lochner (he cites hardcore fundamentalist material
as "*REAL* RESEARCH), the Valgosi (they favored hanging folks), and this idiot
Olson. You and they have become a conservative splinter faction, "Pothier," and
as such make perfectly valid topics of study for those who study violent
dissident groups. After all, the Mormon Student Center in California *was*
bombed. Aryan Nation does exploit LDS issues to intimidate. Hence you and your
teensy little cadre of supporters (including those posting under multiple
names) are clearly in the same class as they are and it is a demonstrably
violent class. A class probably as violent as the "militias" have been. A class
which over centuries has caused many, many innocent deaths. Go figure.

Of course, if you want to claim that I'm lying, why not sue me for slander? You
have my name and address. You didn't hesitate to threaten the moderator with
bogus legal action. Why not me? Likely because you know that the truth is the
ultimate defense and that as usual the truth is on my side, not yours. But if
you want go ahead and sue me, "Pothier." I'd love it. Or like your cohorts in
the Aryan Nations, is it really just physical violence that you want to incite?

Mr. Wizard




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.