Re: Visual Objects compared to Visual Basic and Visual C.

> If you are refering to VB.Net, don't know why anybody would still be using
> VB 6,
I do not know why also, but i think 98%  of the VB programmers does.

If you do not have a memory leak yourself, you might rember VO is a little
behind with a .NET version.
But as soon as it is there, it will have the stuff you mention.

Erik


"Rob Panosh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in
bericht news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Comparing to VB is VO a real OOP langangue where VB is not. You can
write
> >>your own classes, inherit classes from VO classes or from your own
> classes,
> >>Overide methods, use both strong and loose typed variables, write early
> and
> >>late bound code
> If you are refering to VB.Net, don't know why anybody would still be using
> VB 6, the you are dead wrong here.
> VB.NET OPP is far superior than Visual Objects. Visual objects doesn't
> support overloading, shadowing, interfaces, and many more options when
> defining classes.
>
> Rob
>
>
> "Erik Visser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Rob,
> > Every language has his (dis)advantages. The ones you mention are all
> > wrappers around the Win32 API.
> >
> > VO is a very nice and easy language compared to VC. Data-access is
famous
> > with VO, but also memorymanagement, the cargage collector, ragged
array's.
> > and the result is fast and reliable code. You do not have to declare
every
> > variable if you do not want to. (but you will)
> > Comparing to VB is VO a real OOP langangue where VB is not. You can
write
> > your own classes, inherit classes from VO classes or from your own
> classes,
> > Overide methods, use both strong and loose typed variables, write early
> and
> > late bound code
> > VO comes with a SDK containing the sourcecode of the part of VO written
in
> > VO (almost everything except f.i. the compiler)
> > With VO you get this newsgroup, where almost every question is answered
> > within hours.
> > VO has a prof. usergroup in the netherlands, check www.sdgn.nl. with
very
> > often very well organised conferences. I think it is the best organised
> > usergroup in the world.
> > VO is limitted to the Win32 api. A .NET version is announced, but
withoot
> a
> > releasedate yet.
> >
> > More inforrmation about VO can be found at www.cavo.com
> >
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Erik
> >
> > "Mobi-Data Helpdesk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Who can explain me why I have to use VO instead
> > > of VB or VC? OR is is there no difference?
> > >
> > > With kind regards
> > > Rob van der Ploeg
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>