Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Visual Objects compared to Visual Basic and Visual C.



>>Comparing to VB is VO a real OOP langangue where VB is not. You can write
>>your own classes, inherit classes from VO classes or from your own
classes,
>>Overide methods, use both strong and loose typed variables, write early
and
>>late bound code
If you are refering to VB.Net, don't know why anybody would still be using
VB 6, the you are dead wrong here.
VB.NET OPP is far superior than Visual Objects. Visual objects doesn't
support overloading, shadowing, interfaces, and many more options when
defining classes.

Rob


"Erik Visser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Rob,
> Every language has his (dis)advantages. The ones you mention are all
> wrappers around the Win32 API.
>
> VO is a very nice and easy language compared to VC. Data-access is famous
> with VO, but also memorymanagement, the cargage collector, ragged array's.
> and the result is fast and reliable code. You do not have to declare every
> variable if you do not want to. (but you will)
> Comparing to VB is VO a real OOP langangue where VB is not. You can write
> your own classes, inherit classes from VO classes or from your own
classes,
> Overide methods, use both strong and loose typed variables, write early
and
> late bound code
> VO comes with a SDK containing the sourcecode of the part of VO written in
> VO (almost everything except f.i. the compiler)
> With VO you get this newsgroup, where almost every question is answered
> within hours.
> VO has a prof. usergroup in the netherlands, check www.sdgn.nl. with very
> often very well organised conferences. I think it is the best organised
> usergroup in the world.
> VO is limitted to the Win32 api. A .NET version is announced, but withoot
a
> releasedate yet.
>
> More inforrmation about VO can be found at www.cavo.com
>
>
> regards,
>
> Erik
>
> "Mobi-Data Helpdesk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Who can explain me why I have to use VO instead
> > of VB or VC? OR is is there no difference?
> >
> > With kind regards
> > Rob van der Ploeg
> >
> >
> >
>
>





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.