Re: Visual Objects 2.7

Malcolm,
> made it compulsory many of us would not upgrade.
IMHO including it into version 2.7 would have been the perfect opportunity.
Adding Unicode support should be seemless and shouldn't cause the developer
any greif.

Rob


"Malcolm Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Rob Panosh wrote:
> > That's why we are rewriting our application using VB.Net ....
> > we needed Unicode support many moons ago .... and as far as I
> > can see it is still a rumor.  When Brian first took VO over we
> > had a lengthy conference call about Unicode support and got
> > the impression that it was at the top of his list. Well anyway
> > you can drop five developers off the VO list ... the only
> > thing we will be using VO for is maintaining our current
> > customers until they upgrade to our new product.
>
> He does have the problem that offering unicode as an option
> is always going to be more work than forcing it, but if he
> made it compulsory many of us would not upgrade.
>
>