
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: why still use C?
- __From__: Dan Pop
- __Subject__: Re: why still use C?
- __Date__: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 04:23:40 -0600
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> glen herrmannsfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>It may or may not be relevant, but PL/I has supported FLOAT DECIMAL
It is relevant. PL/I was designed to be the ultimate programming
language and it failed big time. Therefore, it should be considered an
excellent example of how NOT to do things ;-)
Dan
--
Dan Pop
DESY Zeuthen, RZ group
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?), (continued)
- Re: why still use C?,
Hans-Bernhard Broeker
- Re: why still use C?,
Richard Bos
- Re: why still use C?,
Fergus Henderson
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Mike Cowlishaw
- Re: why still use C?,
P.J. Plauger
- Re: why still use C?,
Dan Pop
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Thad Smith
- Re: why still use C?,
Thad Smith
- Re: why still use C?,
Eric Backus
- Re: why still use C?,
ozbear
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Keith Thompson
- Re: why still use C?,
Gene Wirchenko
- Re: why still use C?,
Mike Cowlishaw
- Re: why still use C?,
Mike Cowlishaw
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Dan Pop
- Re: why still use C?,
Dan Pop