
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?)
- __From__: Dan Pop
- __Subject__: Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?)
- __Date__: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:34:19 -0600
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gene Wirchenko) writes:
> That would be nice, too, but what if you need decimal FLOAT?
What for? Given the intrinsic nature of floating point, if the base is
relevant to your application, then you should review the application.
If the ability of representing $3.11 *exactly* is important, simply do all
your computing in pennies and the base used by your floating point
representation no longer matters (only the precision is relevant).
Dan
--
Dan Pop
DESY Zeuthen, RZ group
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: why still use C?, (continued)
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Jerry Feldman
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Gene Wirchenko
- Re: why still use C?,
Thad Smith
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Dan Pop
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: why still use C?,
Hans-Bernhard Broeker
- Re: why still use C?,
Richard Bos
- Re: why still use C?,
Fergus Henderson
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Mike Cowlishaw
- Re: why still use C?,
P.J. Plauger
- Re: why still use C?,
Dan Pop
- Re: Decimal Floating Point (was Re: why still use C?),
Thad Smith
- Re: why still use C?,
Thad Smith
- Re: why still use C?,
Eric Backus