
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Patrick Schaaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >If I am writing a program to communicate over a LAN using UDP broadcasts, do > >I need a directed broadcast or a flooded broadcast? ie should I be using > >255.255.255.255, an address based on the network address ie xxx.yyy.255.255 > >or calculating the address by taking into account the subnet mask? > > Use 255.255.255.255. Forget that directed broadcast exists, except when > you are a network _administrator_ with the job to secure your infrastructure > (by making damn sure directed broadcasts WON'T work) > > Directed broadcasts are practically never used. They make nice toys for > network admins, until they are misused for the first time by some bozo. > Then, they'll set their routers to block & drop them. As a consequence, > except maybe in some highly controlled environments, directed broadcast > is never used, because it just won't work. How can a directed broadcast be misused ?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |