Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: how to group synonyms ?



"Paul Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| "mcstock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
| > good feedback, billy
| >
| > the focus of my original post was synonyms vs hard-coded schema names -- 
so
| > it we agree on the basic concept but disagree on PUBLIC vs PRIVATE -- 
| > neither view being wrong, certainly worth debating ;-)
| >
|
| this may be common knowledge, but wouldn't one solution be to just
| have a login trigger execute "ALTER SESSION SET
| CURRENT_SCHEMA=<app_owner>;"
|
| and not use either PUBLIC or PRIVATE synonyms?
|
| yes, there are multiple reasons why an existing application can't do
| this.
| (e.g. the app constructs tables on the fly (not GTTs) and you do not
| want the user to create in the app_owner schema (this is why I don't
| use the current_schema route).
|
| but it deserves mention in this thread.
|
| Pd

good call Paul -- and this works well with the after logon trigger to set
the schema

however, cross-schema references will still require some sort of synonyms

-- mcs





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.