Re: "We don't do triggers"

"Daniel Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Volker Hetzer wrote:
> 
> > "Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >>What if you have customers that wish your product to run
> >>on a variaty of backends?
> >>Makes sense to put (1 version!) of the business rules in
> >>the middle tier to me. Use the database just as a pool of data;
> >>no logic
> > 
> > What if they wish to use a variety of middle tiers?
> > 
> > Greetings!
> > Volker
> 
> You see if it a bad thing to force a single database.
> But perfectly fine to force a single front-end and middle-tier.
> Why?
> Because it is the only thing they know.
> And what they know is good and wonderful and smells like flowers
> And what they don't know is dark and evil and conspiratorial
> 
> Throwing logic in the face of dogma?
> What kind of anarchist are you? ;-)
Dunno what I said wrong. I meant to show that the argument "multiple
different dbs are better" isn't in favour of an application server because
for any appserver the same argument could be made. So, an appserver
doesn't really solve the portability problem because then you'd have
to be compatible with the app server *AND* the appserver has
to be compatible woth the db.

Greetings!
Volker