
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
- __From__: Bob Badour
- __Subject__: Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
- __Date__: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:33:56 -0500
"Alfredo Novoa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Bob Badour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> > > If this is your criteria then both are imperative
> >
> > This is the criterion for imperative languages. If you use other
criteria,
> > you misspeak. You may verify this using any number of sources including
the
> > ISO/IEC standard vocabularies.
>
> I have verified several sources, some use your criterion and others
> don't:
I suggest you notify the sources that equate imperative with procedural that
their definitions are wrong. Direct them to the ISO/IEC standard
vocabularies as the definitive source.
- Re: Optimizing Queries in OODBs (was: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL), (continued)
- Re: Optimizing Queries in OODBs (was: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL),
Patrick K. O'Brien
- Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL,
Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Optimizing Queries in OODBs (was: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL),
Patrick K. O'Brien
- Re: Optimizing Queries in OODBs (was: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL),
Patrick K. O'Brien
- Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL,
Patrick K. O'Brien
- Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL,
Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL,
Bob Badour
- Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL,
Patrick K. O'Brien
- Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL,
Patrick K. O'Brien
- Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL,
Paul Vernon