
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Hi Gary well ... I guess all I can say is that I wish I had your machine. Yes it look like its beginning to be localised and specifically my machine. I have had CA check this out and level 1.5 cannot fault what I have done. However there is probably something both CA and I am missing - I have now reverted the installation back to 2.5 and will await further information from CA L2. The 3 config changes you pointed out are noted in the patch.doc as recommended changes 1846, 2105 and 2279. Will post more info when I get any. Might try again when we have finished current round of testing for this release we are trying to get out. regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary Hansford) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > John, > > I've fired up your config on my test installation and it goes fine > (blink and it's done). However my test machine is fast (4x1250 CPU's, > fibre SAN) and has patch rel 9567, which could account for not seeing > what you're encountering. > > Some things I note about your config are highlighted in the > patch.html documentation. > > ii.*.dbms.*.opf_old_subsel:ON > ii.*.dbms.*.opf_stats_nostats_factor:1.0 > ii.*.dbms.*.opf_stats_nostats_max:ON > > You might want to double check these before you go into production. > > Gary
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |