
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Keppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Each row is uniquely identified with the integer ID and the object > name field. I don't think that the way you're doing this makes much sense. You really should consider dropping all the duplicate key stuff and making the actual unique identifier (ID + name) the (non-duplicate) primary key. That way, you get to have all the information about the case-sensitivity of the name part of the key in *one* place: the comparison function. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |