
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Guido, thanks for responding. I don't want to use perl scripts. When you say external tables, you mean like 'temp tables'? I dont want to insert or create any new rows either... any way out? Thanks again. "Guido Konsolke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... > > I have a list of 100 SSNs, say. There is a table that stores SSNs. > this > > table has 60 of the 100 SSNs. > > Is it possible to write a query that gives me the 40 SSNs that are > not > > there - without using temp tables/inserts in to any table and > without > > writing PL/SQL(meaning without writing to files/using looping > constructs > > etc.). > > I want to avoid getting the 60 SSNs that are there in the table, > bumping it > > up against the 100 using other tools.. > > > > It all boils down to : how to convert a comma-seperated list to a > record > > set/query output using just a query ? > > > > Any pointers will be greatly appreciated... > > > > Thanks. > > > > Hi Joe, > > external tables come to mind. Or maybe a perl script could help. > Since you don't want PL/SQL, UTL_FILE is no option. > > hth, > Guido > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |