
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Hi Andrew I want to use the netlist for LVS on a legacy design. The rest of the netlist has parameters without the $ prefix. The schematic for this design was lost and I re-created a schematic from a derivative part. I am using symbols and models created by someone that is no longer reachable. We want to perform an LVS using the original layout tool to verify that the new schematic matches the old (in production) layout. The LVS tool complains about the $ and [] in the netlist. I want to do as few hand edits as possible to minimize the chance of introducing errors. Regards JNB On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 07:44:22 +0000, Andrew Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >That's correct CDL syntax, so I don't see what there is to "correct"? > >CDL is a language which is spice-like, and originated for Dracula. It's >described in the Dracula reference manual (chapter 5 if my memory serves >me correctly). > >However, CDL is not intended as a generic spice netlister. What were >you intending to use the CDL netlist for? > >Regards, > >Andrew. > >On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:39:10 GMT, Johannes Blower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Hi >> >>I created a part symbol and it netlists and simulates correctly in >>Spectre with the correct parameters and model name in the netlist. >> >>When I export CDL for the netlist contains $ before the parameters and >>the wrong name for the part (also prefixed with a $). Where do I >>correct this? >> >>Thanks in advance. >> >>JNB >> >>A special thanks for Bernd who has helped me and others so generously.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |