Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: AMS c35 version3.51



"Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Dear all,
>     My cadence model library have upgraded from c35verion 3.50 to c35verion
> 3.51, I have found that the performance of my design is greatly changed!
>     It seems that the model have changed a lots. I hope to know is there
> anyone have similar experience? Also, when i use the PRIMLIB -> cvar, if the
> cmax=10pF, the "column" parameter become >5XXXXXX. It is very strange,
> right?
>     Any suggestion?

I suggest that you log into AMS' own customer report system and ask
them what they have done with hit-kit between rev 3.50 and 3.51. I
know that 3.50 was not verified for cadence ic500 (ic446 max) and that
3.51 now support ic500.

Your question could as much be influenced by work at AMS as any change
Cadence has made between ic446 and ic500. My experience with AMS is
that they offer swift support.

Otherwise I have not experienced your problem because I haven't used
that technology.

-- 
Svenn



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.