
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Processors in memory... NOT
- __From__: Jan C . Vorbrüggen
- __Subject__: Re: Processors in memory... NOT
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:53:33 -0600
> And, of course, if you have a large die, possibly so large that you no
> longer expect to be able to reach all of it in a single clock, you
> have to start worrying about the global movement of data among
> processors.
Just so.
> If you can arrange the calculation as a streaming
> process, then organizing the movement of data is a problem that solves
> itself: data might eventually migrate across the entire die in many
> clock ticks, after having gone though multiple neighboring CPU's to do
> so, possibly without ever having languished in cache, and certainly
> without ever having required access to global bandwidth or global cache.
I expect you know the philosophy underlying multigrid methods...methinks
there are some similarities here.
Jan
- Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?, (continued)
- Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
David C DiNucci
- Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Stefan Monnier
- Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Russell Wallace
- Processors in memory... NOT,
News sbc
- Re: Processors in memory... NOT,
George William Herbert
- Re: Processors in memory... NOT,
Robert Myers
- Re: Processors in memory... NOT,
Jan C . Vorbrüggen
- Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Robert Myers
- Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Jan C . Vorbrüggen
- Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Andrew Reilly
- Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Robert Myers
Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Jan C . Vorbrüggen
Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Andrew Reilly
Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Jan C . Vorbrüggen
Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
del cecchi
Re: 1teraflops cell processor possible?,
Robert Myers