
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Possibly so, but I haven't engaged in the kind of overblown rhetoric >the DoE has to justify this machine, whose only real purpose is to >knock the Earth Simulator off the top spot > >http://www.ultrasim.info/esrr_meeting/bland.ppt I think my major concern around this whole situation is that the purpose of the Earth Simulator doesn't seem to have been "to knock ASCI white off the top spot". I think the really interesting product of the Earth Simulator so far isn't the machine, or the fourteen-figure Linpack flops figure, but the annual report http://www.es.jamstec.go.jp/esc/images/annualreport2002/index.htm of the kinds of things people are doing with it. I haven't seen anything remotely comparable for the ASCI machines; of course the major application for the ASCI machines does not produce publishable papers, but I haven't seen even references to a compilation of "interesting unclassified things done on the ASCI systems". I may just be ignorant, it may be that the way funding bodies in the US work mean that interesting calculations done on ASCI would be dispersed across high-impact-factor journals rather than compiled as a single annual report; if the "interesting work" compilation exists, I'd very much appreciate a reference to it. Tom
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |