
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Keith R. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Since (at least the mill I've been listening to) the 440 is >DEADBEEF, I don't think that's what is being proposed. Until IBM offers a better replacement embedded CPU option, qualified on their ASIC fab processes as well as available as a standalone CPU, the 440 isn't going anywhere. It probably won't even if a 64-bit version (640? ;-) intended for embedded applications shows up; sometimes the extra 1-2 mm^2 matter, and 64-bittedness doesn't. -george william herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |