
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Anne & Lynn Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > recent blurb on "virtual server services" > http://news.com.com/2100-7339_3-5083775.html?tag=nefd_top > > or time-sharing service bureau by any other name > > misc. past posts on time-sharing service bureaus > http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#timeshare there have been some number of recent references to gnosis/keykos from a security perspective. however within the contenxt of utility computing and time sharing service bureaus and stuff like: http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/10/01/HNsunsema_1.html when I was asked to perform due diligence on gnosis was that the fine grain capabiilty wasn't done so much for security isolation (that was also needed in an open time-sharing service bureau operation) .... but that they were trying to tie the fine grain capabilities to accounting/charging operation. the cp/67 (and then vm/370) virtual machine operation that were used as basis for security isolation at a number of these service bureaus had only relatively gross resource consumption accounting. One of the stated goals that I was given for gnosis was that 3rd party clients could deploy a broad spectrum of applications and services on the time-sharing service bureau platform .... and that gnosis would be able to perform useage accounting by their customers on an application and service basis (remitting charges to the 3rd party clients) ... aka fine grain capabilities weren't so much a security construct (which it also provided) but an useage accounting construct. misc. past gnosis/keykos postings: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#69 TSS ancient history, was X86 ultimate CISC? designs) http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000g.html#22 No more innovation? Get serious http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#73 7090 vs. 7094 etc. http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#33 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#35 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#10 TSS/360 http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#59 Blade architectures http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#0 Blade architectures http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#4 markup vs wysiwyg (was: Re: learning how to use a computer) http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#43 IBM doing anything for 50th Anniv? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#63 Hercules and System/390 - do we need it? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#75 30th b'day http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#18 Multiple layers of virtual address translation http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#41 Segments, capabilities, buffer overrun attacks http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#15 two pi, four phase, 370 clone http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003k.html#50 Slashdot: O'Reilly On The Importance Of The Mainframe Heritage http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003l.html#19 Secure OS Thoughts http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003l.html#22 Secure OS Thoughts http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003l.html#26 Secure OS Thoughts http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#24 Intel iAPX 432 -- Anne & Lynn Wheeler | http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/ Internet trivia 20th anv http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |