
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I've seen very few problems with them, but I'd do some testing before I put an OLTP DB on it. Keep in mind that you need some CPU overhead for any high I/O app with network based storage. If this is an issue, Netapp has serve block-based storage. The real big advantage I see with Netapp over traditional block-based storage is that it's still on the WAFL filesystem (UFS, VXFS, NTFS formatted over that). The WAFL filesystem means that you can still do all the cool replication that Netapp has to offer. Netapp has a great relationship with Oracle. They say Oracle's own databases run on Netapp HW. --paul "Faeandar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anyone surfing this group doing this? If so what do you think about > it? I know of several companies that do and have had extensive > conversation with one of the admins doing this. > > I think it's a good idea if you can build in the availability > initially. OnTap software has huge advantages for databases but the > filer hardware can be less than enterprise robustness sometimes. > > Thanks. > > ~F
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |