Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Shared Storage?



Nik Simpson wrote:

You need to look a bit harder, there are a number of SATA/PATA storage systems with FC interfaces on the market, take a look at www.nexsan.com for an example. Also, if you only have two systems, then you don't need a switch, both systems can be direct attached to the array. Yes, the FC HBAs are still quite pricey, but overall a SATA based FC array and HBAs for two servers isn't that bad, unless your budget is *very* limited.

Another possible solution that would get rid of the FC costs is iSCSI, again
there are a number of iSCSI arrays that use SATA/PATA drives.

Thanks for the link, I had not found them.. probably becasue I was looking for suppliers in the UK.. :)


My guess from the configuration you've described is that the I/O demands for the two systems are not equal, I'd bet that the mailserver needs I/O performance much more than the webserver, in which case, why not direct attach the storage to the mail server and share some of its capacity with the webserver?

Yes the email server will probably have a higher I/O requirement, but the web server will also be working quite hard in terms of I/O becasue its not just a standard website its a web based application that incorporates file storage..


I was thinking of building the MySQL server with the larger storage capacity and then sharing it with the other two similar to what you have suggested..

The perfect solution would be a NAS or SAN or iSCSI system that I cauld start with 3 drives and then add a 4th and 5th and 6th as I needed them being able to easily extend the array and filesystem.. hotswap would be nice but not really critical..


As I said previously, giving us an idea of your budget, i.e. how much you are prepared/able to spend would help in suggesting possible solutions.

Budget I would estimate at around £1500 for the starting system with three 250GB or 300GB drives and expansion capacity to do to 6 or 8 drives.. So I think NAS is about the only option at that budget and even that may be pushing it..





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.