
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
> >Yes its per stream. Is that good or can it be tweaked further? >We use Netbackup NDMP. not sure if increasing the stream would improve >performance, I think 18995 KB/s is near the rated capacity of an LTO drive, >(15MB/second native, 30MB/second compressed)? you're probably near peak performance then, after 15mb/sec it is data dependent. > >> >> Can you post the firmware version you're using? >Firmware of FC bridge model: StorageTek SN3250 Router Version: 3.06 2009j This explains part of it. We have 2 10k Crossroads and 1 SN3250 (rebadged Xroads). The 3250 ha been much less problematic, it's the 10k's that are killing me. I believe it has to do with the load but still haven't been able to confirm that. Thanks for the info though, and glad to hear your setup is working well. ~F >> Are you chaining any >> drives off the bus? >No. R150 has a FC adaptor connected to one crossroad bridge. which has 2 >LTO SCSI LVD drives attached to it in a L700. Robot controlled by the >netbackup master server running on solaris. > >>Question bombardment I know, but it's nice to >> hear someone is able to use it and I'd like to be able to duplicate >> that.... >> >> Thanks. >> >> ~F >> >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:13:50 GMT, "Net Worker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >We have a filer (R150) that uses fiber to connect to an L700 via a >crossroad >> >bridge (1 Gig 1/f). >> >No problems so far, but we don't have a fiber switch in between, >> >just R150-> crossroad.-> tape drives >> >Performance averages 18995 KB/s >> >-G >> > >> >"Faeandar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:06:09 +0100, "Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes" >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Performance blows, every weekend when we run fulls something goes >into >> >> >> the weeds, and everytime (but once) it's been the bridge. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >Please provide us with more details about the problems you have. >> >> > >> >> >Rene >> >> > >> >> >> >> Well, they're all over the board but they always start with >> >> performance dropping to it's knees. The bridge has very little in the >> >> way of online diags so inevitably the solution is reboot the bridge. >> >> Everything from buffer overflows to mis-presenting scsi id's. >> >> >> >> I'm looking more for information from people who already have this >> >> sort of setup and what they think of it. Not necessarily a bridge but >> >> filers using fiber to backup. >> >> Ideally I'd go stright to fiber drives but SDLT has no native fiber >> >> yet. >> >> >> >> ~F >> > >> >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |