
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Jeff Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > We are building a new radio telescope called PAST > (http://astrophysics.phys.cmu.edu/~jbp/past6.pdf) > which we will install at the South Pole or in Western China. > > To make this work, will need to sample (6 to 8 bit precision) dozens > of analog voltages at 400 Msample/sec and feed these data streams into > PCs. One PC per sampler. > > The flash ADCs we need are available (Maxim), but we are finding it > difficult to get the data into the PC. > > One simple way would be to use SCSI ultra640, but so far I have not > found any 640 adapters on the market. Is any 640 adapter available? > anything coming soon? > > or we could go right into a PCI-X bus. has anyone out there > done this at 400 Mb/s? is this hard to do? FPGA core liscense > for this seems expensive ($9K), with no guarentee of 400 mByte rates. > > is there a better way? > > thanks > > -Jeff Peterson Why dont you get an AGP Graphics processor, and try to connect your ADCs to the GPU Memory Bus. Run a PCI card for graphics on the PC. The GPUs are programmable , so you might even be able to do some processing inside... Since you only need 400 MSamples/S, you could live with the Maxims. If you want to get some real speed, then maybe something like the Atmel TS8308500 (500 Mspl/s), TS8388B (1 Gspl/s) or TS83102G0B (Gspl/s) could be of interest. Going up to Giga Samples per second, would make your problem worse though :-) http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/datasheets.asp?family_id=611 -- Best Regards Ulf at atmel dot com These comments are intended to be my own opinion and they may, or may not be shared by my employer, Atmel Sweden.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |