
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
>Temperature, Vcc, and process variations are already (and have always >been) covered by the worst-case assumptions behind the Xilinx timing >analyzer numbers. But they don't know anything about the input clock jitter. In the old days, we mostly ignored clock jitter. Or rather build clock distribution systems with low enough jitter that it was reasonable to ignore it. I think part of the round-down that people are doing today is to cover the clock jitter that they haven't thought about much. It's interesting/important at todays higher speeds. Quick. How much jitter on the clock going into your PCI card? (Is that even covered in the specs?) Don't forget Ray's stories of SSO adding to the jitter. -- The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my other mailboxes. Please do not send unsolicited bulk e-mail or unsolicited commercial e-mail to my suespammers.org address or any of my other addresses. These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |