
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Hi, I am working with PCI-X Interface, which is 64bits wide and 133Mhz. But I have some problem in getting this much frequency in Xilinx FPGA? Regards, Muthu "walala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > "Kolja Sulimma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "walala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > Dear all, > > > > > > Is PCI the only convinient interfacing unit that talks with CPU by > inserting > > > something into a computer conviniently? What is the speed of that? Is > there > > > any faster method? > > PCI is the only relatively fast interface that is available on almost > > any computer for internal extensions and has good operating system > > support for hardware drivers. The usual 32-Bit, 33MHz PCI can provide > > 133MB/s in theory of which about 90MByte/s are usable without to much > > effort for writes, considerably less for reads. There are also 66MHz > > and/or 64-Bit variants available on more expensive mainboards. > > > > But there are lots of alternatives. > > There are faster "PCI-like" interfaces like AGP, PCI-X, PCI-Express > > (only possible with some FPGAs). > > You can also connect your hardware via ATA or SCSI busses. That's > > about the speed of PCI. For data aquisition tasks you can make your > > hardware look like a tape drive so that you do not need to write a > > driver and readout software. Just use the tar command for that. > > > > Probably the fastest interface inside a PC is a memory slot. But > > getting OS support for your device in this case is not straight > > forward. But there are a couple of GByte/s available there. > > > > And then you can use all the external interfaces: FireWire, USB, > > Ethernet, ... > > > > Kolja Sulimma > > Hi, Kolja, > > Thanks a lot for your help! > > Can you compare in a little more detail of those internal or external > interfaces? > > For example, USB vs. PCI? Or PCI-X vs. FireWire? > > I guess USB is not as fast as PCI, right? > > Thanks a lot, > > -Walala
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |