
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Symon" wrote > > "Jim Granville" wrote > > Following the recurring thread of 5V IO, > > the loss thereof, and 'the price of progress', here are some > > of the newest numbers from the uC industry : > > > > Philips LPC2129 Spartan IIE > > General 256KF/ARM Advanced FPGA > > > > Vcore 1.8V 1.8V > > Vio <5.5V <3.6V > > Icctyp 10uA 10mA > > IccMAX <500uA <200mA > > > > Icc numbers are Static, ie represent standby power levels. > > FPGA of similar core Vcc is chosen, and smallest IIe device is chosen > > to avoid too much die-area skew effect. > > -jg > > Hi Jim, > I haven't used this Philips part but, just so I know you're not > comparing apple and oranges, this Philips part supports upteen different > I/O standards? From 3.3V LVTTL to 2.5V LVDS at 622M? > cheers, Syms Sorry if this was not clear - this is from the uC industry, so it is comparing 'like process' capability (~ 0.18u) - what the silicon DOES is, of course, quite different. However, the fundamentals like IO and leakage are a bit more portable and it's good to compare real numbers when a vendor claims some 'spec erosion' is the 'price of progress' - implication: 'We couldn't do anything about that'. -jg
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |