Re: So called "copyright" pictures

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>    Lasse Langwadt Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>    [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dr. Richard E. Hawkins) wrote:
> >> 
> >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>>Everett M. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Hansen) writes:
> >>>
> >>>>>The wedding might belong to the bride, 
> >>>>
> >>>>Aha!  Suspicions confirmed.  It's the bride's triumphal
> >>>>ceremony and the groom is a pro forma adjunct.
> >>>
> >>>Confirmed??? You mean that someone didn't know this???
> >> 
> >> 
> >> <GRIN>  A wedding is the first and last time the gal will have
> >> a starring role.  After the "I do"s, she gets hit with reality
> >> when she has to wash the Prince's underwear.
> >> 
> >
> >hopefully they have lived together before the wedding and she would 
> >already know, anything else would be stupid ...
> 
> That's not the tradition.  The white gown is supposed to symbolize
> to you males that she hasn't been before.

White gowns are a pretty recent tradition, less than 200 years.
Before that they could be lots of colors, though pastels were usually
favored.

-- Patrick