
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"david austin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > The method can cope with Bill Sloman's objection by building a > piecewise-linear acceleration profile. > My experience is that this is not necessary > Dave Austin I hope your lucky break continues. A lot depends on how dissipative your load is. Several of the steppers I've played with had a fairly high-Q first resonances, and the starting sequence that worked involved enegergising the coils for several cycles of the resonant period, until the rotor had settled down aligned with the magnetic field, then making the first step period one quarter of the inverse of the resonant frequency. Do it wrong, and the rotor doesn't rotate, it just sits there buzzing at the stepping frequency, which isn't helpful. -------- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen > "Bill Sloman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "david austin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > This site has a pdf with a neat method to generate timings for a linear > > > ramp. > > > It is quick enough to do in real time in a timer-comparator ISR on a > PIC. > > > > > > http://mysite.freeserve.com/stepper > > > > A linear ramp isn't all that helpful in accelerating a stepper motor. > > > > If your maximim stepping rate is higher than the first resonance > > frequency of the stepper motor you are using, you do have to chose > > your acceleration sequence with the resonant frequency in mind, and an > > arbitrary linear ramp probably won't serve. Read Douglas W. Jones on > > the subject. > > > > http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/step/physics.html > > > > ------- > > Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |